Exploring the risks of automation bias in healthcare artificial intelligence applications: A Bowtie analysis
This study conducts an in-depth review and Bowtie analysis of automation bias in AI-driven Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) within healthcare settings. Automation bias, the tendency of human operators to over-rely on automated systems, poses a critical challenge in implementing AI-driven te...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Journal of Safety Science and Resilience = An quan ke xue yu ren xing (Ying wen) Ročník 5; číslo 4; s. 460 - 469 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
Elsevier B.V
01.12.2024
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd |
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 2666-4496, 2666-4496 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Shrnutí: | This study conducts an in-depth review and Bowtie analysis of automation bias in AI-driven Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) within healthcare settings. Automation bias, the tendency of human operators to over-rely on automated systems, poses a critical challenge in implementing AI-driven technologies. To address this challenge, Bowtie analysis is employed to examine the causes and consequences of automation bias affected by over-reliance on AI-driven systems in healthcare. Furthermore, this study proposes preventive measures to address automation bias during the design phase of AI model development for CDSSs, along with effective mitigation strategies post-deployment. The findings highlight the imperative role of a systems approach, integrating technological advancements, regulatory frameworks, and collaborative endeavors between AI developers and healthcare practitioners to diminish automation bias in AI-driven CDSSs. We further identify future research directions, proposing quantitative evaluations of the mitigation and preventative measures. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2666-4496 2666-4496 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.06.001 |