Psychological Science Is Not Race Neutral

In their analysis in a previous issue of Perspectives on Psychological Science, Roberts and colleagues argued that the editors, authors, and participants throughout subfields of psychological science are overwhelmingly White. In this commentary, we consider some of the drivers and consequences of th...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Perspectives on psychological science Ročník 17; číslo 1; s. 270 - 275
Hlavní autoři: Dupree, Cydney H., Kraus, Michael W.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.01.2022
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Témata:
Ignorance
Inequality
Psychology
Race
Racial inequality
Racism
inequality
race
psychology
meta-science
ISSN:1745-6916, 1745-6924, 1745-6924
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In their analysis in a previous issue of Perspectives on Psychological Science, Roberts and colleagues argued that the editors, authors, and participants throughout subfields of psychological science are overwhelmingly White. In this commentary, we consider some of the drivers and consequences of this racial inequality. Drawing on race scholarship from within and outside the field, we highlight three phenomena that create and maintain racial inequality in psychology: (a) racial ignorance, (b) threats to belonging, and (c) racial-progress narratives. We close by exploring steps that journals and authors can take to reduce racial inequality in our field, ending with an appeal to consider the experience of scholars of color in race scholarship and in psychological science more broadly.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1745-6916
1745-6924
1745-6924
DOI:10.1177/1745691620979820