Meaning and gender differences

•We test gender differences with regards to the perceived meaning (of donations).•We show that women's perceived meaning is more sensitive to the existence of gift rewards than that of men.•When the gift incentive is nonexistent, women attribute a greater sense of meaning to their contribution,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of behavioral and experimental economics Jg. 95; S. 101757
Hauptverfasser: Bezalel, Jonathan, Mugerman, Yevgeny, Winter, Eyal
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Elsevier Inc 01.12.2021
Schlagworte:
ISSN:2214-8043, 2214-8051
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We test gender differences with regards to the perceived meaning (of donations).•We show that women's perceived meaning is more sensitive to the existence of gift rewards than that of men.•When the gift incentive is nonexistent, women attribute a greater sense of meaning to their contribution, whereas this effect is largely absent or even reversed in men.•We conjecture that women are more “Kantians” than men in their attitude towards decisions involving intrinsic motivation. This study utilizes the crowdfunding setting, and examines gender differences with regard to the perceived meaning of donations. The crowdfunding mechanism creates a singular reciprocal interaction where motivations can be examined and compared. We show that women's perceived meaning is more sensitive to the existence of gift rewards than that of men. When the gift incentive is nonexistent, women attribute a greater sense of meaning to their contribution, whereas this effect is largely absent or even reversed in men. Our findings have far-reaching implications in all aspects of donor retention strategies. Specifically, our findings indicate that women are more aligned with the Kantian doctrine of rejecting self-interest considerations of altruistic behavior than men.
ISSN:2214-8043
2214-8051
DOI:10.1016/j.socec.2021.101757