Multi-Objective Design of a Horizontal Flow Subsurface Wetland

An artificial wetland is used to treat gray, waste, storm or industrial water. This is an engineering system that uses natural functions of vegetation, soil and organisms to provide secondary treatment to gray water. In the physical design of each artificial wetland, there are various action factors...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Water (Basel) Ročník 16; číslo 9; s. 1253
Hlavní autoři: Mendez-Valencia, Jhonatan, Sánchez-López, Carlos, Reyes-Pérez, Eneida
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Basel MDPI AG 01.05.2024
Témata:
ISSN:2073-4441, 2073-4441
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:An artificial wetland is used to treat gray, waste, storm or industrial water. This is an engineering system that uses natural functions of vegetation, soil and organisms to provide secondary treatment to gray water. In the physical design of each artificial wetland, there are various action factors that must meet certain characteristics so that the level of gray-water pollution is reduced. In this sense, several design methodologies have been developed and reported in the literature, but some are customized designs and often do not meet the required decontamination objectives. This challenge increases as the complexity of the task in its structure also increases. Particularly in this work, a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm is used to optimize the physical design of a horizontal flow subsurface wetland (HFSW) for gray-water treatment. The study aims to achieve two objectives: first, to minimize the physical volume, and second, to maximize the contaminant removal efficiency. The defined objective functions depend on six design variables called hydraulic retention time, width, length, water depth inside the wetland, substrate depth and slope. Three constraint functions are also defined: removal efficiency greater than 95%, physical volume below 500 m3 and compliance with a length–width ratio is 3:1, varying the population size and number of generations equal to 200, 400, and 600. The set of solutions according to the number of generations as well as the Pareto front corresponds to the best solution that complies with the constraints of the problem of oversizing the HFSW, and the Pareto front shows the interaction between the objectives and their behavior, reflecting the problem’s nature as minimization–maximization.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2073-4441
2073-4441
DOI:10.3390/w16091253