Faster Minimization of Tardy Processing Time on a Single Machine

This paper is concerned with the 1 | | ∑ p j U j problem, the problem of minimizing the total processing time of tardy jobs on a single machine. This is not only a fundamental scheduling problem, but also an important problem from a theoretical point of view as it generalizes the Subset Sum problem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Algorithmica Vol. 84; no. 5; pp. 1341 - 1356
Main Authors: Bringmann, Karl, Fischer, Nick, Hermelin, Danny, Shabtay, Dvir, Wellnitz, Philip
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01.05.2022
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
ISSN:0178-4617, 1432-0541
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper is concerned with the 1 | | ∑ p j U j problem, the problem of minimizing the total processing time of tardy jobs on a single machine. This is not only a fundamental scheduling problem, but also an important problem from a theoretical point of view as it generalizes the Subset Sum problem and is closely related to the 0/1-Knapsack problem. The problem is well-known to be NP-hard, but only in a weak sense, meaning it admits pseudo-polynomial time algorithms. The best known running time follows from the famous Lawler and Moore algorithm that solves a more general weighted version in O ( P · n ) time, where P is the total processing time of all n jobs in the input. This algorithm has been developed in the late 60s, and has yet to be improved to date. In this paper we develop two new algorithms for problem, each improving on Lawler and Moore’s algorithm in a different scenario. Our first algorithm runs in O ~ ( P 7 / 4 ) time, and outperforms Lawler and Moore’s algorithm in instances where n = ω ~ ( P 3 / 4 ) . Our second algorithm runs in O ~ ( min { P · D # , P + D } ) time, where D # is the number of different due dates in the instance, and D is the sum of all different due dates. This algorithm improves on Lawler and Moore’s algorithm when n = ω ~ ( D # ) or n = ω ~ ( D / P ) . Further, it extends the known O ~ ( P ) algorithm for the single due date special case of 1 | | ∑ p j U j in a natural way. Both algorithms rely on basic primitive operations between sets of integers and vectors of integers for the speedup in their running times. The second algorithm relies on fast polynomial multiplication as its main engine, and can be easily extended to the case of a fixed number of machines. For the first algorithm we define a new “skewed” version of ( max , min ) -Convolution which is interesting in its own right.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0178-4617
1432-0541
DOI:10.1007/s00453-022-00928-w