Modelling and multiobjective optimization for productivity improvement in high speed milling of Ti–6Al–4V using RSM and GA

Productivity can be improved in machining by achieving higher material removal rate (MRR) and better surface finish at lower power consumption along with higher tool life. Present work focuses on analyzing power consumption, material removal rate; surface roughness and tool wear in high speed millin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Jg. 39; H. 12; S. 5069 - 5085
Hauptverfasser: Sahu, Neelesh Kumar, Andhare, Atul B.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2017
Springer Nature B.V
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1678-5878, 1806-3691
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Productivity can be improved in machining by achieving higher material removal rate (MRR) and better surface finish at lower power consumption along with higher tool life. Present work focuses on analyzing power consumption, material removal rate; surface roughness and tool wear in high speed milling of Ti–6Al–4V using response surface methodology. Models are developed with experimental data measured after performing face milling operation sequentially using design of experiments. Developed models are validated and reformed using Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and stepwise backward elimination method. Developed models showed correlation coefficient ( R 2 ) more than 95% which means models can best explain the experimental data. Further, multiobjective optimization is performed to minimize power consumption; surface roughness and tool wear as well as to maximize MRR using response optimizer with desirability approach. Optimum process parameters obtained are: cutting speed = 133.5 m/min, feed rate = 0.14 mm/tooth and depth of cut = 2.33 mm. Validation of optimized results is done with three confirmation experiments at the optimum conditions and the responses are taken as average of the three confirmation experiments. Additionally, Pareto optimal points are found for conflicting objective functions using multiobjective genetic algorithm.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1678-5878
1806-3691
DOI:10.1007/s40430-017-0804-y