Estimating Driver's Lane-Change Intent Considering Driving Style and Contextual Traffic

Estimating a driver's lane-change (LC) intent is very important so as to avoid traffic accidents caused by improper LC maneuvers. This paper proposes a lane-change Bayesian network (LCBN) incorporated with a Gaussian mixture model (GMM), termed as LCBN-GMM, to estimate a driver's LC intent...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems Ročník 20; číslo 9; s. 3258 - 3271
Hlavní autoři: Li, Xiaohan, Wang, Wenshuo, Roetting, Matthias
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: New York IEEE 01.09.2019
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Témata:
ISSN:1524-9050, 1558-0016
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Estimating a driver's lane-change (LC) intent is very important so as to avoid traffic accidents caused by improper LC maneuvers. This paper proposes a lane-change Bayesian network (LCBN) incorporated with a Gaussian mixture model (GMM), termed as LCBN-GMM, to estimate a driver's LC intent considering a driver's driving style over varying scenarios. According to the scores made by participates with a behavioral-psychological questionnaire, three driving styles are classified. In order to get more effective labeled LC and lane-keep (LK) data for model training, we propose a gaze-based labeling (GBL) method by monitoring a drivers's gaze behavior, instead of using a time-window labeling method. The capability of LCBN-GMM to estimate a driver's lane-change intent is evaluated in different LC scenarios and driving styles, in comparison to support vector machine and Naive Bayes. Data are collected in a seat-box-based driving simulator where 32 drivers, consisting of 9 aggressive, 15 neutral, and 8 conservative drivers, participated. Experimental results demonstrate that the LCBN-GMM with GBL achieves the best performance, estimating a driver's LC intent an average of 4.5 s ahead of actual LC maneuvers with 78.2% accuracy considering both driving style and contextual traffic, compared with other approaches.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1524-9050
1558-0016
DOI:10.1109/TITS.2018.2873595