Psychological treatments for mental disorders in adults: A review of the evidence of leading international organizations

Most mental health services throughout the world currently regard evidence-based psychological treatments as best practice for the treatment of mental disorders. The aim of this study was to analyze evidence-based treatments drawn from RCTs, reviews, meta-analyses, guides, and lists provided by the...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Clinical psychology review Ročník 54; s. 29 - 43
Hlavní autoři: Moriana, Juan Antonio, Gálvez-Lara, Mario, Corpas, Jorge
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2017
Témata:
Adult
Adult mental disorders
Evidence-based psychology
Humans
Mental Disorders - psychology
Mental Disorders - therapy
Meta-analysis
Psychological treatments
Psychotherapy - methods
RCTs
Review article
Treatment Outcome
Adult mental disorders
Evidence-based psychology
Review article
RCTs
Psychological treatments
Meta-analysis
ISSN:0272-7358, 1873-7811, 1873-7811
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Most mental health services throughout the world currently regard evidence-based psychological treatments as best practice for the treatment of mental disorders. The aim of this study was to analyze evidence-based treatments drawn from RCTs, reviews, meta-analyses, guides, and lists provided by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Division 12 (Clinical Psychology) of the American Psychological Association (APA), Cochrane and the Australian Psychological Society (APS) in relation to mental disorders in adults. A total of 135 treatments were analyzed for 23 mental disorders and compared to determine the level of agreement among the organizations. The results indicate that, in most cases, there is little agreement among organizations and that there are several discrepancies within certain disorders. These results require reflection on the meaning attributed to evidence-based practice with regard to psychological treatments. The possible reasons for these differences are discussed. Based on these findings, proposals to unify the criteria that reconcile the realities of clinical practice with a scientific perspective were analyzed. •The evidence-based psychological treatments are the best practice for the treatment of mental disorders•There is lack of consensus in the evidence presented by different organizations•High degree of agreement was found for some disorders, while significant discrepancies were found for others•23 different treatments for depression have proven effective according to the organizations studied•Proposals to unify and improve the criteria that reconcile the clinical practice with a scientific view were analyzed
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0272-7358
1873-7811
1873-7811
DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.03.008