Facts and values in psychotherapy—A critique of the empirical reduction of psychotherapy within evidence‐based practice

This paper addresses an implicit presupposition in research‐supported psychological treatments and evidence‐based practice in psychology. It argues that the notion of research‐supported psychological treatments is based on a reductive conceptualisation of psychotherapy. Research‐supported psychologi...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Ročník 23; číslo 5; s. 1075 - 1080
Hlavní autori: Berg, Henrik, Slaattelid, Rasmus
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2017
Predmet:
ISSN:1356-1294, 1365-2753, 1365-2753
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:This paper addresses an implicit presupposition in research‐supported psychological treatments and evidence‐based practice in psychology. It argues that the notion of research‐supported psychological treatments is based on a reductive conceptualisation of psychotherapy. Research‐supported psychological treatments hinge upon an empirical reduction where psychotherapy schools become conceptualized as mere collections of empirical propositions. However, this paper argues that the different psychotherapy schools have distinct ethoses that are constituted by normative claims. Consequently, the evaluation of the different psychotherapy schools and the practice of psychotherapy should include the underlying normative claims of these ethoses.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1356-1294
1365-2753
1365-2753
DOI:10.1111/jep.12739