Critical appraisal of nonrandomized studies—A review of recommended and commonly used tools

Rationale, aims, and objectives When randomized controlled trial data are limited or unavailable, or to supplement randomized controlled trial evidence, health technology assessment (HTA) agencies may rely on systematic reviews of nonrandomized studies (NRSs) for evidence of the effectiveness of hea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Jg. 25; H. 1; S. 44 - 52
Hauptverfasser:	Quigley, Joan M., Thompson, Juliette C., Halfpenny, Nicholas J., Scott, David A.
Format:	Journal Article
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2019
Schlagworte:	Bias Clinical trials Content analysis evaluation Evaluation Studies as Topic Evidence-based medicine Evidence-Based Medicine - methods health care health economics Humans medical informatics Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards Observer Variation Systematic review systematic reviews Systematic Reviews as Topic Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods evaluation medical informatics systematic reviews evidence-based medicine health care health economics
ISSN:	1356-1294, 1365-2753, 1365-2753
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!