What do university rankings by fields rank? Exploring discrepancies between the organizational structure of universities and bibliometric classifications

University rankings by fields are usually based on the research output of universities. However, research managers and rankings consumers expect to see in such fields a reflection of the structure of their own organizational institution. In this study we address such misinterpretation by developing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientometrics Vol. 98; no. 3; pp. 1955 - 1970
Main Authors: Robinson-García, Nicolás, Calero-Medina, Clara
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.03.2014
Springer
Subjects:
ISSN:0138-9130, 1588-2861
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract University rankings by fields are usually based on the research output of universities. However, research managers and rankings consumers expect to see in such fields a reflection of the structure of their own organizational institution. In this study we address such misinterpretation by developing the research profile of the organizational units of two Spanish universities: University of Granada and Pompeu Fabra University. We use two classification systems, the subject categories offered by Thomson Scientific which are commonly used on bibliometric studies, and the 37 disciplines displayed by the Spanish I-UGR Rankings which are constructed from an aggregation of the former. We also describe in detail problems encountered when working with address data from a top down approach and we show differences between universities structures derived from the interdisciplinary organizational forms of new managerialism at universities. We conclude by highlighting that rankings by fields should clearly state the methodology for the construction of such fields. We indicate that the construction of research profiles may be a good solution for universities for finding out levels of discrepancy between organizational units and subject fields.
AbstractList University rankings by fields are usually based on the research output of universities. However, research managers and rankings consumers expect to see in such fields a reflection of the structure of their own organizational institution. In this study we address such misinterpretation by developing the research profile of the organizational units of two Spanish universities: University of Granada and Pompeu Fabra University. We use two classification systems, the subject categories offered by Thomson Scientific which are commonly used on bibliometric studies, and the 37 disciplines displayed by the Spanish I-UGR Rankings which are constructed from an aggregation of the former. We also describe in detail problems encountered when working with address data from a top down approach and we show differences between universities structures derived from the interdisciplinary organizational forms of new managerialism at universities. We conclude by highlighting that rankings by fields should clearly state the methodology for the construction of such fields. We indicate that the construction of research profiles may be a good solution for universities for finding out levels of discrepancy between organizational units and subject fields.
University rankings by fields are usually based on the research output of universities. However, research managers and rankings consumers expect to see in such fields a reflection of the structure of their own organizational institution. In this study we address such misinterpretation by developing the research profile of the organizational units of two Spanish universities: University of Granada and Pompeu Fabra University. We use two classification systems, the subject categories offered by Thomson Scientific which are commonly used on bibliometric studies, and the 37 disciplines displayed by the Spanish I-UGR Rankings which are constructed from an aggregation of the former. We also describe in detail problems encountered when working with address data from a top down approach and we show differences between universities structures derived from the interdisciplinary organizational forms of new managerialism at universities. We conclude by highlighting that rankings by fields should clearly state the methodology for the construction of such fields. We indicate that the construction of research profiles may be a good solution for universities for finding out levels of discrepancy between organizational units and subject fields. Adapted from the source document.
Author Calero-Medina, Clara
Robinson-García, Nicolás
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Nicolás
  surname: Robinson-García
  fullname: Robinson-García, Nicolás
  email: elrobin@ugr.es
  organization: EC3: Evaluación de la Ciencia y de la Comunicación Científica, Departamento de Información y Comunicación, Universidad de Granada
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Clara
  surname: Calero-Medina
  fullname: Calero-Medina, Clara
  organization: Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28548748$$DView record in Pascal Francis
BookMark eNp9kU9rFTEUxYO04GvrB3CXjeBmajKZP5mVSKlVKLhRXIY7maRNzUvG3Iz19Zv025p5ryi46Cpwz_ndcM85IUchBkPIa87OOWP9O-ScD3XFuKg4b_uqf0E2vJWyqmXHj8imCLIauGAvyQniHSuMYHJDHr_fQqZTpEtwv0xCl3c0Qfjhwg3ScUetM37C_eg9vfw9-5iKRCeHOpkZgnam-Ey-NybQfGtoTDcQ3ANkFwN4ijktOi-pCPbfHysEYaKjG72LW5OT01R7QHTW6T2LZ-TYgkfz6uk9Jd8-Xn69-FRdf7n6fPHhutKi5blqJFiAoZsGMYLuoR6Erc2oB2k70dq2qWtpGjaIiXE2lfkoO82aUY6dncTExSl5e9g7p_hzMZjVthxnvIdg4oKK9yXCpmPtan3zZAXU4G1a70c1J7eFtFO1bBvZN7L4-MGnU0RMxv61cKbWutShLlVaUWtdqi9M_x-jXd4nkRM4_yxZH0ic125MUndxSSV8fAb6A6qTsGA
CODEN SCNTDX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_015_1742_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acalib_2024_102881
crossref_primary_10_1093_reseval_rvz014
crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_23360
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_017_2403_1
crossref_primary_10_1109_TETC_2018_2854266
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_024_05159_0
crossref_primary_10_1093_reseval_rvv006
crossref_primary_10_1002_leap_1264
Cites_doi 10.1002/asi.10153
10.1126/science.1165821
10.1007/BF02016793
10.1002/asi.22708
10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00149-4
10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6
10.1007/s11192-006-0087-z
10.1017/CBO9780511498831
10.1596/0-8018-5254-4
10.1023/A:1022378804087
10.1007/s11192-011-0418-6
10.1007/s11192-011-0398-6
10.1002/asi.21371
10.1002/asi.22735
10.1002/asi.22857
10.3152/095820207X227529
10.1007/s11192-014-1263-1
10.3989/redc.2013.4.1042
10.1002/asi.22923
10.1007/s11192-012-0913-4
10.1007/s11192-013-1025-5
10.1108/OIR-12-2012-0214
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013
2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
8BP
E3H
F2A
DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-1157-7
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition
Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)
Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition
Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA)
DatabaseTitleList
Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Sciences (General)
Computer Science
EISSN 1588-2861
EndPage 1970
ExternalDocumentID 28548748
10_1007_s11192_013_1157_7
GroupedDBID --K
-4Z
-59
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
-~X
.86
.DC
.VR
06D
0R~
0VY
123
1B1
1N0
1SB
2.D
203
28-
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5QI
5VS
67Z
6NX
77K
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AANZL
AAOBN
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTHY
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACIWK
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACSNA
ACYUM
ACZOJ
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADMLS
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFGCZ
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AYJHY
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBWZM
BDATZ
BGNMA
BSONS
CAG
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GXS
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Y
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
LLZTM
M4Y
MA-
MET
MKB
N2Q
N9A
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQ-
NQJWS
NU0
O-J
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P19
P9O
PF0
PT4
PT5
QOK
QOS
R-Y
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RKA
RNI
ROL
RPX
RPZ
RSV
RZC
RZE
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S3B
SAP
SCJ
SCLPG
SCO
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
STPWE
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TN5
TSG
TSK
TSV
TUC
U2A
UG4
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WH7
WHG
WK6
WK8
YLTOR
Z45
Z5O
Z7R
Z7U
Z7V
Z7X
Z7Z
Z81
Z83
Z88
Z8M
Z8R
Z8T
Z8W
Z92
ZMTXR
~A9
~EX
77I
7X2
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABJCF
ABRTQ
ACSTC
ADHKG
AEUYN
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFFHD
AFHIU
AFKRA
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ARAPS
ATCPS
ATHPR
AYFIA
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKSAR
CCPQU
CITATION
HCIFZ
K7-
KB.
M0K
M7P
M7S
PATMY
PCBAR
PDBOC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQGLB
PTHSS
PYCSY
63O
AABYN
AAFGU
AAPBV
ABFGW
ABKAS
ACBMV
ACBRV
ACBYP
ACIGE
ACIPQ
ACTTH
ACVWB
ACWMK
ADGRI
ADMDM
ADTIX
AEYWE
AIMYW
AJDOV
AKQUC
IPNFZ
IQODW
KSO
UNUBA
Z7S
8BP
E3H
F2A
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-48afaa96d93bac7a293f2ebc98f635f54228e4093d010dbc9b86c04b8b6fd3d13
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 15
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000331559800023&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0138-9130
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 14:59:18 EDT 2025
Fri Nov 25 06:04:25 EST 2022
Sat Nov 29 05:58:23 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:24:18 EST 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:35:16 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Subject classification
Address data
Fields
Institutional structure
University rankings
Research field
Bibliometric analysis
Filing
Bibliometrics
Scientific research
Classification
Interdisciplinary field
Author productivity
Language English
License http://www.springer.com/tdm
CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c351t-48afaa96d93bac7a293f2ebc98f635f54228e4093d010dbc9b86c04b8b6fd3d13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 1728646051
PQPubID 23477
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1728646051
pascalfrancis_primary_28548748
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_013_1157_7
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s11192_013_1157_7
springer_journals_10_1007_s11192_013_1157_7
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Dordrecht
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Dordrecht
PublicationSubtitle An International Journal for all Quantitative Aspects of the Science of Science, Communication in Science and Science Policy
PublicationTitle Scientometrics
PublicationTitleAbbrev Scientometrics
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Springer Netherlands
Springer
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Netherlands
– name: Springer
References Cuxac, Lamirel, Bonvallot (CR7) 2013; 97
Van Leeuwen (CR23) 2007; 16
CR17
De Bruin, Moed (CR8) 1993; 26
Deaton (CR9) 1997
Bornmann, Stefaner, Moya-Anegón, Mutz (CR4) 2013c; arXiv
Rescher (CR19) 2006
López-Illescas, Moya-Anegón, Moed (CR14) 2011; 88
Moed (CR15) 2010; 4
Pudovkin, Garfield (CR18) 2002; 53
Morris (CR16) 2002; 31
CR2
Bornmann, Mutz, Daniel (CR3) 2013; 64
Glänzel, Schubert (CR12) 2003; 56
Torres-Salinas, Moreno-Torres, López-Cózar, Herrera (CR22) 2011; 88
Cheng, Liu (CR6) 2006; 68
Waltman, Eck (CR26) 2012; 96
CR5
Van Raan (CR24) 2005; 62
Gibbons, Limoges, Nowotny, Schwartzmann, Scott, Trow (CR11) 1994
Borgatti, Mehra, Brass, Labianca (CR1) 2009; 323
CR21
CR20
García, Rodriguez-Sánchez, Fdez-Valdivia, Robinson-Garcia, Torres-Salinas (CR10) 2012; 63
Leydesdorff, Opthof (CR13) 2010; 61
Waltman, Calero-Medina, Kosten, Noyons, Tijssen, van Eck (CR28) 2012; 63
C López-Illescas (1157_CR14) 2011; 88
1157_CR26
JA García (1157_CR10) 2012; 63
Y Cheng (1157_CR6) 2006; 68
L Leydesdorff (1157_CR13) 2010; 61
TN Leeuwen Van (1157_CR23) 2007; 16
RE Bruin De (1157_CR8) 1993; 26
SP Borgatti (1157_CR1) 2009; 323
A Deaton (1157_CR9) 1997
1157_CR20
AI Pudovkin (1157_CR18) 2002; 53
1157_CR21
L Bornmann (1157_CR3) 2013; 64
1157_CR17
W Glänzel (1157_CR12) 2003; 56
1157_CR7
L Waltman (1157_CR28) 2012; 63
M Gibbons (1157_CR11) 1994
1157_CR5
1157_CR4
HF Moed (1157_CR15) 2010; 4
1157_CR2
N Rescher (1157_CR19) 2006
N Morris (1157_CR16) 2002; 31
D Torres-Salinas (1157_CR22) 2011; 88
AFJ Raan Van (1157_CR24) 2005; 62
References_xml – volume: 53
  start-page: 1113
  issue: 13
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1119
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals
  publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  doi: 10.1002/asi.10153
– volume: 323
  start-page: 892
  year: 2009
  end-page: 895
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Network analysis in the social sciences
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1165821
– volume: arXiv
  start-page: 1212
  year: 2013c
  end-page: 0304
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualization of results from multi-level models
  publication-title: Online Information Review
– volume: 26
  start-page: 65
  issue: 1
  year: 1993
  end-page: 80
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Delimitation of scientific subfields using cognitive words from corporate addresses in scientific publications
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1007/BF02016793
– ident: CR2
– volume: 63
  start-page: 2419
  issue: 12
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2432
  ident: CR28
  article-title: The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection indicators and interpretation
  publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  doi: 10.1002/asi.22708
– volume: 96
  start-page: 699
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  end-page: 716
  ident: CR26
  article-title: Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison
  publication-title: Scientometrics
– ident: CR21
– volume: 31
  start-page: 817
  issue: 5
  year: 2002
  end-page: 833
  ident: CR16
  article-title: The developing role of departments
  publication-title: Research Policy
  doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00149-4
– volume: 62
  start-page: 133
  issue: 1
  year: 2005
  end-page: 143
  ident: CR24
  article-title: Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6
– volume: 4
  start-page: 381
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  end-page: 422
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals
  publication-title: Journal of Informetrics
– volume: 68
  start-page: 135
  issue: 1
  year: 2006
  end-page: 150
  ident: CR6
  article-title: A first approach to the classification of the top 500 world universities by their disciplinary characteristics using scientometrics
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0087-z
– year: 2006
  ident: CR19
  publication-title: Epistemetrics
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511498831
– volume: 97
  start-page: 47
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 58
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Efficient supervised and semi-supervised approaches for affiliations disambiguation
  publication-title: Scientometrics
– year: 1997
  ident: CR9
  publication-title: Analysis of household surveys
  doi: 10.1596/0-8018-5254-4
– volume: 56
  start-page: 357
  issue: 3
  year: 2003
  end-page: 367
  ident: CR12
  article-title: A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1023/A:1022378804087
– volume: 88
  start-page: 771
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  end-page: 786
  ident: CR22
  article-title: A methodology for institution-field ranking based on a bidimensional analysis: The IFQ A-index
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0418-6
– ident: CR17
– volume: 88
  start-page: 563
  issue: 2
  year: 2011
  end-page: 574
  ident: CR14
  article-title: A ranking of universities should account for differences in their disciplinary specialization
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0398-6
– volume: 61
  start-page: 2365
  issue: 11
  year: 2010
  end-page: 2369
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Scopus’s source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations
  publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  doi: 10.1002/asi.21371
– ident: CR5
– volume: 63
  start-page: 2328
  issue: 11
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2340
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Mapping academic institutions according to their journal publication profile: Spanish universities as a case study
  publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  doi: 10.1002/asi.22735
– year: 1994
  ident: CR11
  publication-title: The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies
– volume: 64
  start-page: 1649
  issue: 8
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1658
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012
  publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  doi: 10.1002/asi.22857
– volume: 16
  start-page: 93
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  end-page: 105
  ident: CR23
  article-title: Modeling of bibliometric approaches and importance of output verification in research performance assessment
  publication-title: Research Evaluation
  doi: 10.3152/095820207X227529
– ident: CR20
– volume: 68
  start-page: 135
  issue: 1
  year: 2006
  ident: 1157_CR6
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0087-z
– ident: 1157_CR20
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1263-1
– ident: 1157_CR21
  doi: 10.3989/redc.2013.4.1042
– volume-title: Analysis of household surveys
  year: 1997
  ident: 1157_CR9
  doi: 10.1596/0-8018-5254-4
– volume-title: The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies
  year: 1994
  ident: 1157_CR11
– volume: 88
  start-page: 563
  issue: 2
  year: 2011
  ident: 1157_CR14
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0398-6
– volume: 31
  start-page: 817
  issue: 5
  year: 2002
  ident: 1157_CR16
  publication-title: Research Policy
  doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00149-4
– volume: 88
  start-page: 771
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 1157_CR22
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0418-6
– volume: 63
  start-page: 2328
  issue: 11
  year: 2012
  ident: 1157_CR10
  publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  doi: 10.1002/asi.22735
– volume: 63
  start-page: 2419
  issue: 12
  year: 2012
  ident: 1157_CR28
  publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  doi: 10.1002/asi.22708
– volume: 56
  start-page: 357
  issue: 3
  year: 2003
  ident: 1157_CR12
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1023/A:1022378804087
– volume: 16
  start-page: 93
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  ident: 1157_CR23
  publication-title: Research Evaluation
  doi: 10.3152/095820207X227529
– volume: 61
  start-page: 2365
  issue: 11
  year: 2010
  ident: 1157_CR13
  publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  doi: 10.1002/asi.21371
– volume: 64
  start-page: 1649
  issue: 8
  year: 2013
  ident: 1157_CR3
  publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  doi: 10.1002/asi.22857
– volume: 53
  start-page: 1113
  issue: 13
  year: 2002
  ident: 1157_CR18
  publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  doi: 10.1002/asi.10153
– ident: 1157_CR2
  doi: 10.1002/asi.22923
– volume: 4
  start-page: 381
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 1157_CR15
  publication-title: Journal of Informetrics
– ident: 1157_CR5
– ident: 1157_CR26
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0913-4
– volume: 62
  start-page: 133
  issue: 1
  year: 2005
  ident: 1157_CR24
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6
– ident: 1157_CR7
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1025-5
– volume: 323
  start-page: 892
  year: 2009
  ident: 1157_CR1
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1165821
– volume: 26
  start-page: 65
  issue: 1
  year: 1993
  ident: 1157_CR8
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1007/BF02016793
– volume-title: Epistemetrics
  year: 2006
  ident: 1157_CR19
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511498831
– ident: 1157_CR17
– ident: 1157_CR4
  doi: 10.1108/OIR-12-2012-0214
SSID ssj0007308
Score 2.1718092
Snippet University rankings by fields are usually based on the research output of universities. However, research managers and rankings consumers expect to see in such...
SourceID proquest
pascalfrancis
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1955
SubjectTerms Bibliometrics
Bibliometrics. Scientometrics
Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation
Computer Science
Exact sciences and technology
Information and communication sciences
Information science. Documentation
Information Storage and Retrieval
Library and information science. General aspects
Library Science
Ranking
Sciences and techniques of general use
Subject fields
Universities
Title What do university rankings by fields rank? Exploring discrepancies between the organizational structure of universities and bibliometric classifications
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-013-1157-7
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1728646051
Volume 98
WOSCitedRecordID wos000331559800023&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1588-2861
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007308
  issn: 0138-9130
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8NAEB60ehDE2qpYH2UFDz4oZLttsjmJiOJBiviit7Cb3UChpKVpBX-K_9aZvGpFBb2FZDcJmXdm5huAY41Rsm8xTJW8gwGKdFAPWupGc7pd4SrjtbNG4Tuv15P9vn-f93EnRbV7kZJMNfW82Y1zqpTkokUAMS1vGVbQ2kmSxofHl1L9Isum6penkizKVOZ3t1gwRutjleB3ibKBFgse55ckaWp7bqr_eutN2MhdTXaZ8UYNlmxch2oxxoHlUl2HWn6UsJMchPp0C94J05uZEZuVlRuM5rvTj3Wm31ha-Zakpy5YWcjHqMl3ghaORv7iuqwIjKGTyUafmj7xrTLc2tkEL0TzZ9AmFRumB3pIuAA0PoCF5OBTRVP2c3Ebnm-un65uW_kYh1YounyKDKAipXzX-EKr0FPoYERtq0NfRujtRF0CIbMYZgqDsaHB81q6odPRUruREYaLHajEo9juArNCGilE23DXYFwvNEfTal0Tth2jlGMa4BT0DMIc45xGbQyDOToz0SNAegREj8BrwFm5ZZwBfPy2uLnAJOUO6kOVXkc24KjgmgDllJIvKrajWRLQHDCXktC8AecFqwS5wkh-fuTen1bvwxp6dJ2sSO4AKkhLewir4et0kEyaqaB8AA0BEDE
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1tS-NAEB48Fe5AfOndcfV1hfugJ4VsN002n0TE4mEtolX6bdnNbkCQVBor-FP8t87krfZQwftW0t0mdGbnJfPMMwC_DWbJkcM0VXIfExTpoR101I3mdToi0DZsF43CvbDfl8NhdFH2cWcV2r0qSeaWetrsxjkhJbloEUFMK_wCCz46LMLxXV7d1OYXVTY3vzw_yaIuZb71EzPOaOleZ_i_JMVAi5mI858iae57uiv_9dSrsFyGmuyo0I01mHNpA1aqMQ6sPNUNWCs_ZWyvJKHe_w7PxOnN7IhNauQGo_nu9GKdmSeWI9-y_NIhq4F8jJp8x-jhaOQvritAYAyDTDZ61fSJT1Xw1k7G-EUyvQdt0qll5tbcES8AjQ9gMQX4hGgqXi7-gOvuyeD4tFWOcWjFosMfUAF0onUU2EgYHYcaA4yk7UwcyQSjnaRDJGQO00xhMTe0eN3IIPZ8I02QWGG5-Anz6Sh1v4A5Ia0Uom15YDGvF4aja3WBjdue1dqzTfAqeaq45DinURt3asrOTPJQKA9F8lBhE_7UW-4Lgo-PFm_PKEm9g_pQZejLJuxWWqPwnFLxRaduNMkUzQELqAjNm3BQqYoqDUb2_i3XP7V6B76eDs57qve3f7YB3zC68wvA3CbMo1zdFizGjw-32Xg7PzQv1EgTFQ
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1tS9xAEB6sShHEtyqeb13BD23lMHubSzafRNSjohyCbfHbspvdgCC543In-FP8t85kk5xXWqH0W0h28zazuzM7M88DcGTQS04cuqmSh-igyADnQUfVaEG3KyJt444vFL6J-315f5_cVjynRZ3tXockfU0DoTTl45OhzU6mhW-cU9YkF20Ci2nHH2AhJM4gctfvfjVTMapvORXzclSLJqz5p1vMLEzLQ13gP8o8ucWM9flbwLRch3qr__0Fa7BSmaDszOvMOsy5fANWa3oHVo32DVivjgr2pQKn_voJXgjrm9kBmzQZHYx432nDnZlnVmbEFeWpU9Yk-DEq_h3hykdUwNjOJ4cxND7Z4E0xKL6Vx7OdjPBCNn0GddK5ZebBPBJeANEKsJQMf8p08puOm_Czd_nj_Hu7ondop6LLx6gYOtM6iWwijE5jjYZH1nEmTWSGVlDWJXAyh-6nsOgzWjxvZJQGoZEmyqywXGzBfD7I3TYwJ6SVQnQsjyz6-8JwXHJdZNNOYLUObAuCWrYqrbDPiYLjUU1Rm0keCuWhSB4qbsG3psvQA3-81_hgRmGaHlSfKuNQtuCw1iCF45eCMjp3g0mhiB8souA0b8FxrTaqmkiKvz9y559af4aPtxc9dXPVv96FJTT6Qp9HtwfzKFa3D4vp0_ihGB2U4-cVBGIb-Q
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What+do+university+rankings+by+fields+rank%3F+Exploring+discrepancies+between+the+organizational+structure+of+universities+and+bibliometric+classifications&rft.jtitle=Scientometrics&rft.au=Robinson-Garcia%2C+Nicolas&rft.au=Calero-Medina%2C+Clara&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.issn=0138-9130&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1955&rft.epage=1970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11192-013-1157-7&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0138-9130&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0138-9130&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0138-9130&client=summon