Computing abduction by using TMS with top-down expectation

We present a method to compute abduction in logic programming. We translate an abductive framework into a normal logic program with integrity constraints and show the correspondence between generalized stable models and stable models for the translation of the abductive framework. Abductive explanat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of logic programming Vol. 44; no. 1; pp. 179 - 206
Main Authors: Iwayama, Noboru, Satoh, Ken
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc 01.07.2000
Subjects:
ISSN:0743-1066, 1873-5789
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We present a method to compute abduction in logic programming. We translate an abductive framework into a normal logic program with integrity constraints and show the correspondence between generalized stable models and stable models for the translation of the abductive framework. Abductive explanations for an observation can be found from the stable models for the translated program by adding a special kind of integrity constraint for the observation. Then, we show a bottom-up procedure to compute stable models for a normal logic program with integrity constraints. The proposed procedure excludes the unnecessary construction of stable models on early stages of the procedure by checking integrity constraints during the construction and by deriving some facts from integrity constraints. Although a bottom-up procedure has the disadvantage of constructing stable models not related to an observation for computing abductive explanations in general, our procedure avoids the disadvantage by expecting which rule should be used for satisfaction of integrity constraints and starting bottom-up computation based on the expectation. This expectation is not only a technique to scope rule selection but also an indispensable part of our stable model construction because the expectation is done for dynamically generated constraints as well as the constraint for the observation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0743-1066
1873-5789
DOI:10.1016/S0743-1066(99)00076-X