Multi-step-ahead prediction of thermal load in regional energy system using deep learning method
[Display omitted] Accurate and reliable multi-step-ahead thermal load prediction is generally considered as the basis of model predictive control and multi-energy dispatch of building energy systems. Conventional approaches to future load time series prediction rely either on iterative one-step-ahea...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Energy and buildings Vol. 233; p. 110658 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Lausanne
Elsevier B.V
15.02.2021
Elsevier BV |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0378-7788, 1872-6178 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | [Display omitted]
Accurate and reliable multi-step-ahead thermal load prediction is generally considered as the basis of model predictive control and multi-energy dispatch of building energy systems. Conventional approaches to future load time series prediction rely either on iterative one-step-ahead predictors or direct predictors, which ignores the temporal dependency between successive loads in time-delay building energy systems. This study, therefore, proposes a temporal attention encoder-decoder network (TA-EDN) model to improve the accuracy of multi-step-ahead thermal load prediction with the following three functional modules: long short-term memory (LSTM) network, which is to process the intrinsic temporal relationships among input and output variables, encoder-decoder network (EDN), which is to realize the multi-input multi-output modeling, and attention mechanism, which is to improve the ability of processing variables with long sequences. An actual regional energy system is selected to perform the 24-hour-ahead prediction using the proposed model as a validation experiment. The results suggest that the TA-EDN model significantly improves the prediction accuracy of the future thermal loads time series, achieving a mean absolute percentage error of 7.4%, compared to that of 9.1% of EDN model, 12.4% of LSTM-IS (a model combining LSTM with iterative strategy) and 12.7% of LSTM-DS (a model combining LSTM with direct strategy). In addition, compared with the ideal benchmark of multi-step-ahead prediction, the proposed TA-EDN model has room for improvement in the prediction of low load or large fluctuation load. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0378-7788 1872-6178 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110658 |