2D vs. 3D Deformable Face Models: Representational Power, Construction, and Real-Time Fitting

Issue Title: Special Issue: Celebrating Kanade's Vision Guest Editors: Katsushi Ikeuchi, Gudrun Klinker, Yuichi Ohta and Richard Szeliski Model-based face analysis is a general paradigm with applications that include face recognition, expression recognition, lip-reading, head pose estimation, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of computer vision Vol. 75; no. 1; pp. 93 - 113
Main Authors: Matthews, Iain, Xiao, Jing, Baker, Simon
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Heidelberg Springer 01.10.2007
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Applied sciences
Artificial intelligence
Computer science; control theory; systems
Construction
Exact sciences and technology
Pattern recognition. Digital image processing. Computational geometry
Studies
Gaze
Image processing
Model-based face analysis
2D Active Appearance Models
Modeling
Non rigid structure
constrained fitting
Posture
3D Morphable Models
Model matching
Facies
Database
real-time fitting
Lip reading
the inverse compositional algorithm
Computer vision
Head
model construction
Face recognition
Image databank
Monocular vision
Pattern recognition
Real time
factorization
Depth of field
structure from motion
non-rigid structure-from-motion
Tridimensional image
representational power
ISSN:0920-5691, 1573-1405
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Issue Title: Special Issue: Celebrating Kanade's Vision Guest Editors: Katsushi Ikeuchi, Gudrun Klinker, Yuichi Ohta and Richard Szeliski Model-based face analysis is a general paradigm with applications that include face recognition, expression recognition, lip-reading, head pose estimation, and gaze estimation. A face model is first constructed from a collection of training data, either 2D images or 3D range scans. The face model is then fit to the input image(s) and the model parameters used in whatever the application is. Most existing face models can be classified as either 2D (e.g. Active Appearance Models) or 3D (e.g. Morphable Models). In this paper we compare 2D and 3D face models along three axes: (1) representational power, (2) construction, and (3) real-time fitting. For each axis in turn, we outline the differences that result from using a 2D or a 3D face model.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0920-5691
1573-1405
DOI:10.1007/s11263-007-0043-2