BUGSJS: a benchmark and taxonomy of JavaScript bugs
Summary JavaScript is a popular programming language that is also error‐prone due to its asynchronous, dynamic, and loosely typed nature. In recent years, numerous techniques have been proposed for analyzing and testing JavaScript applications. However, our survey of the literature in this area reve...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Software testing, verification & reliability Vol. 31; no. 4 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Chichester
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.06.2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0960-0833, 1099-1689 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Summary
JavaScript is a popular programming language that is also error‐prone due to its asynchronous, dynamic, and loosely typed nature. In recent years, numerous techniques have been proposed for analyzing and testing JavaScript applications. However, our survey of the literature in this area revealed that the proposed techniques are often evaluated on different datasets of programs and bugs. The lack of a commonly used benchmark limits the ability to perform fair and unbiased comparisons for assessing the efficacy of new techniques. To fill this gap, we propose BugsJS, a benchmark of 453 real, manually validated JavaScript bugs from 10 popular JavaScript server‐side programs, comprising 444k lines of code (LOC) in total. Each bug is accompanied by its bug report, the test cases that expose it, as well as the patch that fixes it. We extended BugsJS with a rich web interface for visualizing and dissecting the bugs' information, as well as a programmable API to access the faulty and fixed versions of the programs and to execute the corresponding test cases, which facilitates conducting highly reproducible empirical studies and comparisons of JavaScript analysis and testing tools. Moreover, following a rigorous procedure, we performed a classification of the bugs according to their nature. Our internal validation shows that our taxonomy is adequate for characterizing the bugs in BugsJS. We discuss several ways in which the resulting taxonomy and the benchmark can help direct researchers interested in automated testing of JavaScript applications. © 2021 The Authors. Software Testing, Verification & Reliability published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
In this study, we propose BugsJS, a benchmark of 453 real JavaScript bugs from 10 server‐side programs. We extended BugsJS with a rich web interface for visualizing and dissecting the bugs' information, as well as a programmable API to access the faulty source code and to execute the corresponding test cases, which facilitates conducting highly reproducible empirical studies and comparisons of JavaScript analysis and testing tools. Moreover, we performed a classification of the bugs according to their nature. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Summary
JavaScript is a popular programming language that is also error‐prone due to its asynchronous, dynamic, and loosely typed nature. In recent years, numerous techniques have been proposed for analyzing and testing JavaScript applications. However, our survey of the literature in this area revealed that the proposed techniques are often evaluated on different datasets of programs and bugs. The lack of a commonly used benchmark limits the ability to perform fair and unbiased comparisons for assessing the efficacy of new techniques. To fill this gap, we propose BugsJS, a benchmark of 453 real, manually validated JavaScript bugs from 10 popular JavaScript server‐side programs, comprising 444k lines of code (LOC) in total. Each bug is accompanied by its bug report, the test cases that expose it, as well as the patch that fixes it. We extended BugsJS with a rich web interface for visualizing and dissecting the bugs' information, as well as a programmable API to access the faulty and fixed versions of the programs and to execute the corresponding test cases, which facilitates conducting highly reproducible empirical studies and comparisons of JavaScript analysis and testing tools. Moreover, following a rigorous procedure, we performed a classification of the bugs according to their nature. Our internal validation shows that our taxonomy is adequate for characterizing the bugs in BugsJS. We discuss several ways in which the resulting taxonomy and the benchmark can help direct researchers interested in automated testing of JavaScript applications. © 2021 The Authors. Software Testing, Verification & Reliability published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
In this study, we propose BugsJS, a benchmark of 453 real JavaScript bugs from 10 server‐side programs. We extended BugsJS with a rich web interface for visualizing and dissecting the bugs' information, as well as a programmable API to access the faulty source code and to execute the corresponding test cases, which facilitates conducting highly reproducible empirical studies and comparisons of JavaScript analysis and testing tools. Moreover, we performed a classification of the bugs according to their nature. JavaScript is a popular programming language that is also error‐prone due to its asynchronous, dynamic, and loosely typed nature. In recent years, numerous techniques have been proposed for analyzing and testing JavaScript applications. However, our survey of the literature in this area revealed that the proposed techniques are often evaluated on different datasets of programs and bugs. The lack of a commonly used benchmark limits the ability to perform fair and unbiased comparisons for assessing the efficacy of new techniques. To fill this gap, we propose BugsJS, a benchmark of 453 real, manually validated JavaScript bugs from 10 popular JavaScript server‐side programs, comprising 444k lines of code (LOC) in total. Each bug is accompanied by its bug report, the test cases that expose it, as well as the patch that fixes it. We extended BugsJS with a rich web interface for visualizing and dissecting the bugs' information, as well as a programmable API to access the faulty and fixed versions of the programs and to execute the corresponding test cases, which facilitates conducting highly reproducible empirical studies and comparisons of JavaScript analysis and testing tools. Moreover, following a rigorous procedure, we performed a classification of the bugs according to their nature. Our internal validation shows that our taxonomy is adequate for characterizing the bugs in BugsJS. We discuss several ways in which the resulting taxonomy and the benchmark can help direct researchers interested in automated testing of JavaScript applications. © 2021 The Authors. Software Testing, Verification & Reliability published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. JavaScript is a popular programming language that is also error‐prone due to its asynchronous, dynamic, and loosely typed nature. In recent years, numerous techniques have been proposed for analyzing and testing JavaScript applications. However, our survey of the literature in this area revealed that the proposed techniques are often evaluated on different datasets of programs and bugs. The lack of a commonly used benchmark limits the ability to perform fair and unbiased comparisons for assessing the efficacy of new techniques. To fill this gap, we propose BugsJS , a benchmark of 453 real, manually validated JavaScript bugs from 10 popular JavaScript server‐side programs, comprising 444k lines of code (LOC) in total. Each bug is accompanied by its bug report, the test cases that expose it, as well as the patch that fixes it. We extended BugsJS with a rich web interface for visualizing and dissecting the bugs' information, as well as a programmable API to access the faulty and fixed versions of the programs and to execute the corresponding test cases, which facilitates conducting highly reproducible empirical studies and comparisons of JavaScript analysis and testing tools. Moreover, following a rigorous procedure, we performed a classification of the bugs according to their nature. Our internal validation shows that our taxonomy is adequate for characterizing the bugs in BugsJS . We discuss several ways in which the resulting taxonomy and the benchmark can help direct researchers interested in automated testing of JavaScript applications. © 2021 The Authors. Software Testing, Verification & Reliability published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| Author | Vancsics, Béla Mesbah, Ali Stocco, Andrea Ferenc, Rudolf Beszédes, Árpád Gyimesi, Péter Mazinanian, Davood |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Péter orcidid: 0000-0001-8504-9038 surname: Gyimesi fullname: Gyimesi, Péter email: pgyimesi@inf.u-szeged.hu organization: University of Szeged – sequence: 2 givenname: Béla surname: Vancsics fullname: Vancsics, Béla organization: University of Szeged – sequence: 3 givenname: Andrea orcidid: 0000-0001-8956-3894 surname: Stocco fullname: Stocco, Andrea organization: Università della Svizzera italiana – sequence: 4 givenname: Davood surname: Mazinanian fullname: Mazinanian, Davood organization: University of British Columbia – sequence: 5 givenname: Árpád orcidid: 0000-0002-5421-9302 surname: Beszédes fullname: Beszédes, Árpád organization: University of Szeged – sequence: 6 givenname: Rudolf orcidid: 0000-0001-8897-7403 surname: Ferenc fullname: Ferenc, Rudolf organization: University of Szeged – sequence: 7 givenname: Ali surname: Mesbah fullname: Mesbah, Ali organization: University of British Columbia |
| BookMark | eNp9kE1PAjEURRuDiYAu_AdNXLkY6LdTd0oUNSQmDrht-jHVQZhiO6D8ewdxZaKLl7c557682wOdOtQlAKcYDTBCZJiaTRzgC44PQBcjKTMsctkBXSQFylBO6RHopTRHCAkpZBfQ69m4eCguoYamrO3rUsc3qGsHG_0Z6rDcwuDhg97owsZq1UCzfknH4NDrRSpPfnYfzG5vpqO7bPI4vh9dTTJLKcGZM5IzkRMnHRNGsJxr54grjWcac5xr5oXPMcMWOYa4ydsxniJOGdbEWNoHZ_vcVQzv6zI1ah7WsW5PKsIJEwS3Wkud7ykbQ0qx9GoVq_aNrcJI7TpRu07UrpOWHf5ibdXopgp1E3W1-M_4qBbl9u9oVUyfn76NL2XSc_4 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1109_TSE_2025_3554403 crossref_primary_10_1145_3593802 crossref_primary_10_1145_3715759 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10664_025_10614_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2022_111423 crossref_primary_10_1109_TSE_2020_3032986 crossref_primary_10_1109_TSE_2022_3194188 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1145/2884781.2884864 10.1109/32.177364 10.1109/TSE.2016.2586066 10.1145/2884781.2884859 10.1145/3062341.3062364 10.1145/3106739 10.1145/2635868.2635929 10.1007/11531142_19 10.1109/ICSE.2015.51 10.1109/ICSE.2017.34 10.1145/1181309.1181314 10.1145/3196398.3196473 10.1109/ICST.2014.17 10.1109/ICSME.2018.00023 10.1109/32.799955 10.1007/s10664-017-9550-0 10.1007/s10664-013-9258-8 10.1145/2610384.2628055 10.1145/3064176.3064188 10.1145/2601248.2601268 10.1109/ICSE.2015.101 10.1109/TSE.2016.2521368 10.1109/ICPC.2015.15 10.1109/ICSE.2017.62 10.1109/TSE.2011.28 10.1145/3236024.3236063 10.1109/WCRE.2012.30 10.1109/ISSRE.2014.40 10.1145/3183440.3195097 10.1145/3135932.3135941 10.7551/mitpress/3828.001.0001 10.1109/ICST.2015.7102595 10.1109/ASE.2017.8115663 10.1145/1985441.1985456 10.1007/978-3-540-31987-0_28 10.1145/2568225.2568257 10.1007/978-3-319-56856-0_11 10.1145/3196398.3196454 10.1016/j.cola.2019.03.006 10.1109/ICSE.2017.66 10.1109/ICST.2013.23 10.1145/1985793.1985871 10.1145/2931037.2931053 10.1109/ASE.2015.26 10.1109/ICTKE.2013.6756268 10.1109/ICSE.2019.00045 10.1145/2884781.2884846 10.1109/ICST.2019.00019 10.1145/3213846.3213866 10.1109/ICST.2018.00022 10.1109/TSE.2010.62 10.1007/s10664-005-3861-2 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.002 10.1109/ICSME.2016.29 10.1109/ICSE.2015.52 10.1109/SANER.2018.8330203 10.1109/ICSE-C.2017.6 10.1109/ICSE.2017.75 10.1109/ICST.2017.28 10.1007/978-3-642-31753-8_18 10.1007/s10664-008-9077-5 10.1109/TSE.2014.2371458 10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227195 10.1109/TSE.2015.2454513 10.1109/ESEM.2017.55 10.1109/ICSE.2019.00048 10.1145/2950290.2950308 10.1109/ASE.2017.8115667 10.1145/2950290.2950294 10.1109/ICST.2017.9 10.1109/ICST.2016.32 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2020 The Authors. Software Testing, Verification & Reliability published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 The Authors. Software Testing, Verification & Reliability published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd – notice: 2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION 7SC 8FD JQ2 L7M L~C L~D |
| DOI | 10.1002/stvr.1751 |
| DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Technology Research Database ProQuest Computer Science Collection Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional |
| DatabaseTitleList | Computer and Information Systems Abstracts CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Computer Science |
| EISSN | 1099-1689 |
| EndPage | n/a |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1002_stvr_1751 STVR1751 |
| Genre | article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office funderid: 2018‐1.2.1‐NKP‐2018‐00004 – fundername: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada funderid: Discovery Accelerator Supplements – fundername: European Social Fund funderid: EFOP‐3.6.3‐VEKOP‐16‐2017‐0002 – fundername: European Commission funderid: GINOP‐2.3.2‐15‐2016‐00037 – fundername: Ministry for Innovation and Technology, Hungary funderid: TUDFO/47138‐1/2019‐ITM |
| GroupedDBID | .3N .4S .DC .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 123 1L6 1OB 1OC 24P 31~ 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 50Y 50Z 52M 52O 52T 52U 52W 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAYOK AAZKR ABCUV ABIJN ABPVW ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACIWK ACPOU ACRPL ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ARCSS ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI CS3 CWDTD D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM EBS EDO EJD F00 F01 F04 F21 FEDTE G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HHY HVGLF HZ~ I-F IX1 JPC KQQ LATKE LAW LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M61 MEWTI MK4 MK~ ML~ MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 NF~ NNB O66 O9- OIG P2P P2W P2X P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N QB0 QRW R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RWI RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TUS UB1 V2E W8V W99 WBKPD WIB WIH WIK WOHZO WWW WXSBR WYISQ WZISG XPP XV2 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAYXX ADMLS AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG AIQQE CITATION O8X 7SC 8FD JQ2 L7M L~C L~D |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-db954682d9d46b6485add2debf4a1518a4f6f8141c0d405b805bbf305341a2bc3 |
| IEDL.DBID | 24P |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 15 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000578852600001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0960-0833 |
| IngestDate | Thu Jul 03 20:24:24 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:15:27 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 05:28:55 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:29:27 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Language | English |
| License | Attribution |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3321-db954682d9d46b6485add2debf4a1518a4f6f8141c0d405b805bbf305341a2bc3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8504-9038 0000-0002-5421-9302 0000-0001-8956-3894 0000-0001-8897-7403 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fstvr.1751 |
| PQID | 2524621405 |
| PQPubID | 1046350 |
| PageCount | 38 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2524621405 crossref_primary_10_1002_stvr_1751 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_stvr_1751 wiley_primary_10_1002_stvr_1751_STVR1751 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | June 2021 2021-06-00 20210601 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-06-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2021 text: June 2021 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Chichester |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Chichester |
| PublicationTitle | Software testing, verification & reliability |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | 2012 2019; 53 2011 2017; 43 1999; 25 2009 1992; 18 2006 2005 1994 2011; 37 2018; 23 2017; 50 2009; 14 2000 2015; 41 2019 2016; 42 2018 2017 2005; 10 2016 2015 2014; 19 2014 2013 2019; 152 2016; 26 e_1_2_10_23_1 e_1_2_10_46_1 e_1_2_10_69_1 e_1_2_10_21_1 e_1_2_10_44_1 e_1_2_10_42_1 e_1_2_10_40_1 e_1_2_10_70_1 e_1_2_10_2_1 e_1_2_10_72_1 e_1_2_10_4_1 e_1_2_10_18_1 e_1_2_10_74_1 e_1_2_10_53_1 e_1_2_10_6_1 e_1_2_10_16_1 e_1_2_10_39_1 e_1_2_10_76_1 e_1_2_10_55_1 e_1_2_10_8_1 e_1_2_10_14_1 e_1_2_10_37_1 e_1_2_10_57_1 e_1_2_10_78_1 e_1_2_10_58_1 e_1_2_10_13_1 e_1_2_10_34_1 e_1_2_10_11_1 e_1_2_10_32_1 e_1_2_10_30_1 e_1_2_10_51_1 e_1_2_10_80_1 e_1_2_10_82_1 e_1_2_10_61_1 e_1_2_10_63_1 e_1_2_10_27_1 e_1_2_10_65_1 e_1_2_10_25_1 e_1_2_10_48_1 e_1_2_10_67_1 e_1_2_10_24_1 e_1_2_10_45_1 e_1_2_10_22_1 e_1_2_10_43_1 e_1_2_10_20_1 e_1_2_10_41_1 Ocariza FS (e_1_2_10_29_1) 2016; 26 e_1_2_10_71_1 e_1_2_10_73_1 e_1_2_10_52_1 e_1_2_10_3_1 e_1_2_10_19_1 e_1_2_10_75_1 e_1_2_10_54_1 e_1_2_10_5_1 e_1_2_10_17_1 e_1_2_10_38_1 e_1_2_10_77_1 e_1_2_10_56_1 e_1_2_10_79_1 e_1_2_10_7_1 e_1_2_10_15_1 e_1_2_10_36_1 e_1_2_10_12_1 e_1_2_10_35_1 e_1_2_10_9_1 e_1_2_10_59_1 e_1_2_10_10_1 e_1_2_10_33_1 e_1_2_10_31_1 e_1_2_10_50_1 e_1_2_10_60_1 e_1_2_10_81_1 e_1_2_10_62_1 e_1_2_10_64_1 e_1_2_10_28_1 e_1_2_10_49_1 e_1_2_10_66_1 e_1_2_10_26_1 e_1_2_10_47_1 e_1_2_10_68_1 |
| References_xml | – year: 2011 – year: 2009 – volume: 41 start-page: 1236 issue: 12 year: 2015 end-page: 1256 article-title: The ManyBugs and IntroClass benchmarks for automated repair of C programs publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) – year: 2012 article-title: Invariant‐based automatic testing of modern web applications publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering – year: 2005 – volume: 23 start-page: 2901 issue: 5 year: 2018 end-page: 2947 article-title: Do automated program repair techniques repair hard and important bugs publication-title: Empirical Software Engineering – volume: 152 start-page: 165 year: 2019 end-page: 181 article-title: Not all bugs are the same: understanding, characterizing, and classifying bug types publication-title: Journal of System Software – volume: 41 start-page: 429 issue: 5 year: 2015 end-page: 444 article-title: Guided mutation testing for JavaScript web applications publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering – start-page: 205 year: 2012 end-page: 214 – start-page: 83 year: 2011 end-page: 92 – start-page: 238 year: 2012 end-page: 252 – year: 2000 – volume: 26 issue: 1 year: 2016 article-title: Automatic fault localization for client‐side JavaScript publication-title: Software Testing Verified Reliability – volume: 10 start-page: 405 issue: 4 year: 2005 end-page: 435 article-title: Supporting controlled experimentation with resting techniques: an infrastructure and its potential impact publication-title: Empirical Software Engineering – year: 2016 – year: 2018 – start-page: 428 year: 2005 end-page: 452 – year: 2014 – year: 1994 – volume: 14 start-page: 286 issue: 3 year: 2009 end-page: 315 article-title: Toward an understanding of bug fix patterns publication-title: Empirical Software Engineering – year: 2012 – volume: 53 start-page: 38 year: 2019 end-page: 52 article-title: Code4Bench: a multidimensional benchmark of Codeforces data for different program analysis techniques publication-title: Journal of Computer Language – volume: 37 issue: 5 year: 2011 article-title: An analysis and survey of the development of mutation testing publication-title: Transactions on Software Engineering – volume: 42 issue: 8 year: 2016 article-title: A survey on software fault localization publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering – start-page: 129 year: 2018 end-page: 140 – start-page: 408 year: 2005 end-page: 422 – start-page: 127 year: 2018 end-page: 137 – volume: 50 start-page: 66:1 issue: 5 year: 2017 end-page: 66:36 article-title: A survey of dynamic analysis and test generation for JavaScript publication-title: ACM Computing Surveys – start-page: 25 year: 2006 end-page: 33 – volume: 25 start-page: 557 issue: 4 year: 1999 end-page: 572 article-title: Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering – start-page: 180 year: 2017 end-page: 182 – volume: 19 start-page: 1665 issue: 6 year: 2014 end-page: 1705 article-title: Bug characteristics in open source software publication-title: Empirical Software Engineering – volume: 18 start-page: 943 issue: 11 year: 1992 end-page: 956 article-title: Orthogonal defect classification—a concept for in‐process measurements publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering – start-page: 314 year: 2015 end-page: 324 – start-page: 1 year: 2013 end-page: 5 – start-page: 60 year: 2015 end-page: 70 – year: 2017 – start-page: 913 year: 2015 end-page: 923 – volume: 43 start-page: 128 issue: 2 year: 2017 end-page: 144 article-title: A study of causes and consequences of client‐side JavaScript bugs publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering – year: 2019 – start-page: 12 pages year: 2019 – start-page: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 10 – start-page: 304 year: 2019 end-page: 315 – year: 2015 – year: 2013 – ident: e_1_2_10_2_1 doi: 10.1145/2884781.2884864 – ident: e_1_2_10_5_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_75_1 doi: 10.1109/32.177364 – ident: e_1_2_10_10_1 doi: 10.1109/TSE.2016.2586066 – ident: e_1_2_10_44_1 doi: 10.1145/2884781.2884859 – ident: e_1_2_10_9_1 doi: 10.1145/3062341.3062364 – ident: e_1_2_10_42_1 doi: 10.1145/3106739 – ident: e_1_2_10_13_1 doi: 10.1145/2635868.2635929 – ident: e_1_2_10_57_1 doi: 10.1007/11531142_19 – ident: e_1_2_10_58_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2015.51 – ident: e_1_2_10_7_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2017.34 – ident: e_1_2_10_74_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_66_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_77_1 doi: 10.1145/1181309.1181314 – ident: e_1_2_10_70_1 doi: 10.1145/3196398.3196473 – ident: e_1_2_10_43_1 doi: 10.1109/ICST.2014.17 – ident: e_1_2_10_65_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSME.2018.00023 – ident: e_1_2_10_47_1 doi: 10.1109/32.799955 – ident: e_1_2_10_73_1 doi: 10.1007/s10664-017-9550-0 – ident: e_1_2_10_78_1 doi: 10.1007/s10664-013-9258-8 – ident: e_1_2_10_16_1 doi: 10.1145/2610384.2628055 – ident: e_1_2_10_31_1 doi: 10.1145/3064176.3064188 – ident: e_1_2_10_24_1 doi: 10.1145/2601248.2601268 – ident: e_1_2_10_51_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2015.101 – ident: e_1_2_10_64_1 doi: 10.1109/TSE.2016.2521368 – ident: e_1_2_10_80_1 doi: 10.1109/ICPC.2015.15 – ident: e_1_2_10_62_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2017.62 – ident: e_1_2_10_12_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_41_1 doi: 10.1109/TSE.2011.28 – ident: e_1_2_10_60_1 doi: 10.1145/3236024.3236063 – ident: e_1_2_10_81_1 doi: 10.1109/WCRE.2012.30 – ident: e_1_2_10_14_1 doi: 10.1109/ISSRE.2014.40 – ident: e_1_2_10_67_1 doi: 10.1145/3183440.3195097 – ident: e_1_2_10_19_1 doi: 10.1145/3135932.3135941 – ident: e_1_2_10_23_1 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/3828.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_10_37_1 doi: 10.1109/ICST.2015.7102595 – ident: e_1_2_10_4_1 doi: 10.1109/ASE.2017.8115663 – ident: e_1_2_10_49_1 doi: 10.1145/1985441.1985456 – ident: e_1_2_10_55_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-31987-0_28 – ident: e_1_2_10_30_1 doi: 10.1145/2568225.2568257 – volume: 26 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_10_29_1 article-title: Automatic fault localization for client‐side JavaScript publication-title: Software Testing Verified Reliability – ident: e_1_2_10_48_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_54_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56856-0_11 – ident: e_1_2_10_21_1 doi: 10.1145/3196398.3196454 – ident: e_1_2_10_72_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cola.2019.03.006 – ident: e_1_2_10_63_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2017.66 – ident: e_1_2_10_34_1 doi: 10.1109/ICST.2013.23 – ident: e_1_2_10_40_1 doi: 10.1145/1985793.1985871 – ident: e_1_2_10_8_1 doi: 10.1145/2931037.2931053 – ident: e_1_2_10_39_1 doi: 10.1109/ASE.2015.26 – ident: e_1_2_10_82_1 doi: 10.1109/ICTKE.2013.6756268 – ident: e_1_2_10_56_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2019.00045 – ident: e_1_2_10_71_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_6_1 doi: 10.1145/2884781.2884846 – ident: e_1_2_10_38_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_22_1 doi: 10.1109/ICST.2019.00019 – ident: e_1_2_10_79_1 doi: 10.1145/3213846.3213866 – ident: e_1_2_10_69_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_3_1 doi: 10.1109/ICST.2018.00022 – ident: e_1_2_10_11_1 doi: 10.1109/TSE.2010.62 – ident: e_1_2_10_15_1 doi: 10.1007/s10664-005-3861-2 – ident: e_1_2_10_76_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.002 – ident: e_1_2_10_52_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSME.2016.29 – ident: e_1_2_10_28_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2015.52 – ident: e_1_2_10_45_1 doi: 10.1109/SANER.2018.8330203 – ident: e_1_2_10_53_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSE-C.2017.6 – ident: e_1_2_10_68_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_25_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2017.75 – ident: e_1_2_10_32_1 doi: 10.1109/ICST.2017.28 – ident: e_1_2_10_33_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31753-8_18 – ident: e_1_2_10_46_1 doi: 10.1007/s10664-008-9077-5 – ident: e_1_2_10_35_1 doi: 10.1109/TSE.2014.2371458 – ident: e_1_2_10_20_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227195 – ident: e_1_2_10_17_1 doi: 10.1109/TSE.2015.2454513 – ident: e_1_2_10_50_1 doi: 10.1109/ESEM.2017.55 – ident: e_1_2_10_18_1 doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2019.00048 – ident: e_1_2_10_26_1 doi: 10.1145/2950290.2950308 – ident: e_1_2_10_27_1 doi: 10.1109/ASE.2017.8115667 – ident: e_1_2_10_59_1 doi: 10.1145/2950290.2950294 – ident: e_1_2_10_61_1 doi: 10.1109/ICST.2017.9 – ident: e_1_2_10_36_1 doi: 10.1109/ICST.2016.32 |
| SSID | ssj0006969 |
| Score | 2.3323536 |
| Snippet | Summary
JavaScript is a popular programming language that is also error‐prone due to its asynchronous, dynamic, and loosely typed nature. In recent years,... JavaScript is a popular programming language that is also error‐prone due to its asynchronous, dynamic, and loosely typed nature. In recent years, numerous... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| SubjectTerms | Applications programs benchmark Benchmarks bug database bug taxonomy BugsJS Empirical analysis Java JavaScript Reproducibility Software reliability Software testing Taxonomy |
| Title | BUGSJS: a benchmark and taxonomy of JavaScript bugs |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fstvr.1751 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2524621405 |
| Volume | 31 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000578852600001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1099-1689 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0006969 issn: 0960-0833 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19960101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bS8MwFA6y-eCL84rTOYL44Etdm6Zdqk_epowxxm7sreRWFbWTthv-fJPepqAg-FAo5TQJJ-cacr4DwClnhJKAmganFjewsB2DCosYbSQCTLGQMq3in_ba_T6ZzbzBGrgsamEyfIjywE1rRmqvtYJTFrdWoKFxsozOlfNTqU_Vsuy2FmmEB6UZdj03A9pz9YUt2y5ghUzUKn_97oxWEebXODV1NJ3av5a4BTbz-BJeZQKxDdZkuANqRe8GmKvyLrCvJ_ej7ugCUsjUl6c3Gr1AGgqY0I-0zgHOA9ilSzpKzQpki8d4D0w6d-ObByNvoGBw20aWIZjnYJcg4QnsMhcTR1kzJCRT26A8PaE4cANiYYubQgVujKiHBcoCKNdGEeP2PqiE81AeAIhl4BDhKDJT6pSMSmwJj2CJhOm1Ja-Ds4KTPs_RxXWTi1c_w0VGvmaGr5lRBycl6XsGqfETUaPYDj_XqthHDsIuUimho6ZLGf_7AP5oPB3ql8O_kx6BDaSvrKSHLA1QSaKFPAbrfJk8x1EzFa8mqN4OO5PeJym-1Rc |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1JS8NAFH5IFfRiXbGug3jwEk0mk3QiXtyq1lrEtOItzBYVtUrTFn--M9mqoCB4CITwkgxv3s687wHsCE4ZjZltCeYIi0jXs5h0qFXHMiaMSKXSLv67Vr3dpvf3wc0EHBa9MBk-RFlwM5qR2muj4KYgvT9GDU0Go_6e9n4695kkWoy8Ckye3ja6rdIS-4GfYe355syW6xbIQjbeL1_-7o_GQebXUDX1NY3q_1Y5B7N5jImOMqGYhwnVW4BqMb8B5eq8CO5x9zxshgeIIa6fPL6y_jNiPYkG7CPtdUBvMWqyEQtT04L48CFZgm7jrHNyYeVDFCzhutixJA884lMsA0l87hPqaYuGpeJ6K7S3p4zEfkwd4ghb6uCNU33xWFsB7d4Y5sJdhkrvradWABEVe1R6msxWJi1jijgyoERhaQd1JWqwW7AyEjnCuBl08RJl2Mg4MsyIDDNqsF2SvmewGj8RrRf7EeWalUTYw8THOi309O9Szv_-gSjs3N2am9W_k27B9EXnuhW1LttXazCDzRGWtOiyDpVBf6g2YEqMBk9JfzOXtk8Tk9j0 |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8NAEF6KinixPrFadREPXmKTzSbdiBdfVWspxT7oLewrKmpakrT4893No1VQEDwEQpgky-zONzPLzjcAHHNGKAmoaXBqcQML2zGosIhRRyLAFAsp0yr-QavebpPh0OuUwHlRC5PxQ8w23LRlpHitDVyORVCbs4bGyTQ6Vd5P5T6L2FEYq3mdcWeGw67nZkx7rj6xZdsFr5CJarNXv3ujeYj5NVBNPU2j_L8xroHVPMKEF9mSWAclGW6ActG9AebGvAnsy_5tt9k9gxQy9eT5nUavkIYCJvQjrXSAowA26ZR2U2CBbPIUb4F-46Z3dWfkLRQMbtvIMgTzHOwSJDyBXeZi4ig8Q0IyNRHK1xOKAzcgFra4KVToxoi6WKAwQDk3ihi3t8FCOArlDoBYBg4RjhIzpU7KqMSW8AiWSJheXfIKOClU6fOcX1y3uXjzM2Zk5Gtl-FoZFXA0Ex1npBo_CVWL-fBzu4p95CDsIpUUOup3qeZ__4Df7Q0e9c3u30UPwXLnuuG37tsPe2AF6fMr6Y5LFSwk0UTugyU-TV7i6CBdap_4Z9bd |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=BUGSJS%3A+a+benchmark+and+taxonomy+of+JavaScript+bugs&rft.jtitle=Software+testing%2C+verification+%26+reliability&rft.au=Gyimesi%2C+P%C3%A9ter&rft.au=Vancsics%2C+B%C3%A9la&rft.au=Stocco%2C+Andrea&rft.au=Mazinanian%2C+Davood&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.issn=0960-0833&rft.eissn=1099-1689&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fstvr.1751&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1002_stvr_1751 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0960-0833&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0960-0833&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0960-0833&client=summon |