Who Gets Served in Gifted Education? Demographic Representation and a Call for Action

The disproportional representation of students from various demographic subgroups within identified gifted and talented populations has long frustrated policy makers, education advocates, researchers practitioners within the field, and those concerned with societal inequality in general. Despite the...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:The Gifted child quarterly Ročník 63; číslo 4; s. 273 - 287
Hlavní autori: Peters, Scott J., Gentry, Marcia, Whiting, Gilman W., McBee, Matthew T.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.10.2019
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Predmet:
Ability Identification
Academically Gifted
Demographics
Disproportionate Representation
Educational evaluation
Educational Policy
Gifted children
Gifted Education
Limited English Speaking
Minority Group Students
State Policy
State Programs
Students
Students with Disabilities
assessment
gifted
equity
underrepresentation
ISSN:0016-9862, 1934-9041, 1934-9041
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:The disproportional representation of students from various demographic subgroups within identified gifted and talented populations has long frustrated policy makers, education advocates, researchers practitioners within the field, and those concerned with societal inequality in general. Despite the prevalence of articles in the media reporting on disproportional representation, little research has been conducted to track whether (a) the representation of these student subgroups, particularly students with limited English proficiency or students with disabilities, has changed over time or (b) states with and without policies differ in proportional representation of students identified with gifts and talents. For example, increasingly, gifted education advocates have pushed for mandates that all students be screened for gifted program eligibility as a way to combat disproportionality, despite little evidence that such methods influence proportionality. Therefore, this study sought to understand whether and how state and national gifted program demographics have changed over time and how proportionality is correlated with state mandates for gifted education identification or services. A preprint of this paper as well as additional figures are available at: https://osf.io/325m9/.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0016-9862
1934-9041
1934-9041
DOI:10.1177/0016986219833738