Designing equitable algorithms

Predictive algorithms are now commonly used to distribute society's resources and sanctions. But these algorithms can entrench and exacerbate inequities. To guard against this possibility, many have suggested that algorithms be subject to formal fairness constraints. Here we argue, however, tha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature Computational Science Vol. 3; no. 7; pp. 601 - 610
Main Authors: Chohlas-Wood, Alex, Coots, Madison, Goel, Sharad, Nyarko, Julian
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Nature Publishing Group 01.07.2023
Subjects:
ISSN:2662-8457, 2662-8457
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Predictive algorithms are now commonly used to distribute society's resources and sanctions. But these algorithms can entrench and exacerbate inequities. To guard against this possibility, many have suggested that algorithms be subject to formal fairness constraints. Here we argue, however, that popular constraints-while intuitively appealing-often worsen outcomes for individuals in marginalized groups, and can even leave all groups worse off. We outline a more holistic path forward for improving the equity of algorithmically guided decisions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2662-8457
2662-8457
DOI:10.1038/s43588-023-00485-4