Designing equitable algorithms
Predictive algorithms are now commonly used to distribute society's resources and sanctions. But these algorithms can entrench and exacerbate inequities. To guard against this possibility, many have suggested that algorithms be subject to formal fairness constraints. Here we argue, however, tha...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Nature Computational Science Vol. 3; no. 7; pp. 601 - 610 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
Nature Publishing Group
01.07.2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 2662-8457, 2662-8457 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Predictive algorithms are now commonly used to distribute society's resources and sanctions. But these algorithms can entrench and exacerbate inequities. To guard against this possibility, many have suggested that algorithms be subject to formal fairness constraints. Here we argue, however, that popular constraints-while intuitively appealing-often worsen outcomes for individuals in marginalized groups, and can even leave all groups worse off. We outline a more holistic path forward for improving the equity of algorithmically guided decisions. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 2662-8457 2662-8457 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s43588-023-00485-4 |