Greedy-assisted teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm for cost-based hybrid flow shop scheduling

[Display omitted] Production scheduling is a strategic process that organizes the execution of jobs on available resources to optimize specific objectives. One significant scheduling challenge is the Cost-based Hybrid Flow Shop (CHFS) problem, which involves optimizing job scheduling across multiple...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Expert systems with applications Jg. 273; S. 126955
Hauptverfasser: Ullah, Wasif, Ab Rashid, Mohd Fadzil Faisae, Nik Mu’tasim, Muhammad Ammar
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Elsevier Ltd 10.05.2025
Schlagworte:
Cost optimization
Hybrid flow shop scheduling
Teaching learning-based optimization algorithm
Hybrid flow shop scheduling
Cost optimization
Teaching learning-based optimization algorithm
ISSN:0957-4174
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] Production scheduling is a strategic process that organizes the execution of jobs on available resources to optimize specific objectives. One significant scheduling challenge is the Cost-based Hybrid Flow Shop (CHFS) problem, which involves optimizing job scheduling across multiple stages to minimize scheduling-related costs. However, limited attention has been given to CHFS when considering holistic cost models using efficient algorithms. This paper presents a novel Greedy-Assisted Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization (GTLBO) algorithm for CHFS. Unlike previous studies that focus on isolated cost factors, this research formulated an integrated mathematical model for CHF holistically capturing labor, energy consumption, maintenance, and late penalty costs. The GTLBO algorithm incorporates a unique hybrid initialization strategy, generating 10 % of the initial population using a Greedy algorithm to enhance exploration efficiency. The performance of GTLBO was evaluated through computational experiments involving 12 test instances, with comparative algorithms included for analysis. Results from the Wilcoxon rank-sum test indicated a significant difference between the outputs of GTLBO and other algorithms, with GTLBO outperforming the comparative algorithms in 75 % of the test instances. Additionally, the case study validation showed that GTLBO can reduce costs by 0.23 % to 4.31 % compared to other algorithms. This research offers valuable insights for manufacturers seeking to optimize CHFS scheduling to reduce production expenses.
ISSN:0957-4174
DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126955