Tight lower bounds for the Workflow Satisfiability Problem based on the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis

•The Workflow Satisfiability Problem (WSP) is a problem used in access control.•The WSP is parameterized by the number of steps.•The WSP is considered for regular and user-independent constraints.•Tight lower bounds are proved for WSP algorithms with the two types of constraints. The Workflow Satisf...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Information processing letters Ročník 116; číslo 3; s. 223 - 226
Hlavní autori: Gutin, Gregory, Wahlström, Magnus
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.03.2016
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Predmet:
ISSN:0020-0190, 1872-6119
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:•The Workflow Satisfiability Problem (WSP) is a problem used in access control.•The WSP is parameterized by the number of steps.•The WSP is considered for regular and user-independent constraints.•Tight lower bounds are proved for WSP algorithms with the two types of constraints. The Workflow Satisfiability Problem (WSP) asks whether there exists an assignment of authorized users to the steps in a workflow specification, subject to certain constraints on the assignment. The problem is NP-hard even when restricted to just not equal constraints. Since the number of steps k is relatively small in practice, Wang and Li (2010) [21] introduced a parametrisation of WSP by k. Wang and Li (2010) [21] showed that, in general, the WSP is W[1]-hard, i.e., it is unlikely that there exists a fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm for solving the WSP. Crampton et al. (2013) [10] and Cohen et al. (2014) [6] designed FPT algorithms of running time O⁎(2k) and O⁎(2klog2⁡k) for the WSP with so-called regular and user-independent constraints, respectively. In this note, we show that there are no algorithms of running time O⁎(2ck) and O⁎(2cklog2⁡k) for the two restrictions of WSP, respectively, with any c<1, unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis fails.
Bibliografia:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0020-0190
1872-6119
DOI:10.1016/j.ipl.2015.11.008