Digital interventions for smoking abstinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Technological advancements have improved patients' health and clinical care through digital interventions. This study investigated the effects of digital interventions on smoking abstinence. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception until December 2021...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of addictive diseases Ročník 41; číslo 1; s. 4 - 29
Hlavní autoři: Amiri, Sohrab, Khan, Moien A.B.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England Taylor & Francis 02.01.2023
Taylor & Francis LLC
Témata:
Abstinence
Bias
Cigarette smoking
Clinical outcomes
Clinical trials
digital intervention
Drug addiction
Health care
Health services
Humans
Intervention
Meta-analysis
Patients
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Smoking
Smoking Cessation
Systematic review
tobacco
abstinence
meta-analysis
Smoking cessation
tobacco
systematic review
digital intervention
ISSN:1055-0887, 1545-0848, 1545-0848
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Technological advancements have improved patients' health and clinical care through digital interventions. This study investigated the effects of digital interventions on smoking abstinence. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception until December 2021. Meta-analysis was carried out using a random-effects model. The degree of heterogeneity, quality, and publication bias of the selected studies was further evaluated. A total of 43 randomized control trial studies were eligible for this study. 38,814 participants from 18 countries were included in the analysis. Digital interventions on seven-day point prevalence abstinence (1 month) showed increased smoking abstinence. The odds ratio was 2.02 and confidence interval (CI) was 1.67-2.43; p < 0.001; I 2 = 55.1%) . The result for a 30-day point prevalence abstinence (1 month) was 1.63 (CI 1.09-2.46; p = 0.018; I 2 = 0%). Digital intervention also had a significant effect on continuous abstinence (odds ratio = 1.68; CI 1.29-2.18; p < 0.001; I 2 = 70.1%) and prolonged abstinence (odds ratio = 1.60; CI 1.19-2.15; p = 0.002; I 2 = 53.6%). There was evidence of heterogeneity and publication bias. Digital interventions led to increased smoking abstinence and can be a valuable tool in smoking cessation. Further research is required to evaluate the long-term impact of digital interventions on outcomes related to smoking cessation.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1055-0887
1545-0848
1545-0848
DOI:10.1080/10550887.2022.2058300