Imagining the thinking machine: Technological myths and the rise of artificial intelligence

This article discusses the role of technological myths in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies from 1950s to the early 1970s. It shows how the rise of AI was accompanied by the construction of a powerful cultural myth: The creation of a thinking machine, which would be able t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Convergence (London, England) Jg. 26; H. 1; S. 3 - 18
Hauptverfasser: Natale, Simone, Ballatore, Andrea
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: London, England SAGE Publications 01.02.2020
Schlagworte:
history of computing
intelligent machines
cybernetics
software studies
Artificial Intelligence
media imaginary
new media
scientific controversies
technological myth
ISSN:1354-8565, 1748-7382
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article discusses the role of technological myths in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies from 1950s to the early 1970s. It shows how the rise of AI was accompanied by the construction of a powerful cultural myth: The creation of a thinking machine, which would be able to perfectly simulate the cognitive faculties of the human mind. Based on a content analysis of articles on AI published in two magazines, the Scientific American and the New Scientist, which were aimed at a broad readership of scientists, engineers and technologists, three dominant patterns in the construction of the AI myth are identified: (1) the recurrence of analogies and discursive shifts, by which ideas and concepts from other fields were employed to describe the functioning of AI technologies; (2) a rhetorical use of the future, imagining that present shortcomings and limitations will shortly be overcome and (3) the relevance of controversies around the claims of AI, which we argue should be considered as an integral part of the discourse surrounding the AI myth.
ISSN:1354-8565
1748-7382
DOI:10.1177/1354856517715164