A Comparison Between the GPI and PID Controllers for the Stabilization of a DC-DC "Buck" Converter: A Field Programmable Gate Array Implementation

This paper presents a comparison between two stabilizing average output feedback controllers implemented on a field programmable gate array (FPGA) facility. A generalized proportional integral (GPI) controller and a proportional integral derivative (PID) controller are implemented using an FPGA, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982) Vol. 58; no. 11; pp. 5251 - 5262
Main Authors: Zurita-Bustamante, E. W., Linares-Flores, J., Guzman-Ramirez, E., Sira-Ramirez, H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York IEEE 01.11.2011
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects:
Actuators
Buck converter
Buck converters
Controllers
Converters
dc-dc power conversion
Dynamic response
Field programmable gate arrays
field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs)
generalized proportional integral (GPI) and proportional integral derivative (PID) control systems
Modulation
Pi control
Proportional integral derivative
Pulse width modulation
Robustness
Voltage control
ISSN:0278-0046, 1557-9948
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper presents a comparison between two stabilizing average output feedback controllers implemented on a field programmable gate array (FPGA) facility. A generalized proportional integral (GPI) controller and a proportional integral derivative (PID) controller are implemented using an FPGA, and their respective performances are duly compared. The GPI controller is found to present a better dynamic response than the PID controller in terms of the settling time while exhibiting a greater degree of robustness regarding disturbance rejection represented by severe changes in static and dynamic loads. The average controllers and their corresponding pulsewidth modulation actuators are implemented using a Spartan 3E1600 FPGA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-0046
1557-9948
DOI:10.1109/TIE.2011.2123857