Data model-based sensor fault diagnosis algorithm for closed-loop control systems

•A linear model is dynamically established based on the gradient change of the control variables from the sensor data, and a baseline model tracker is designed.•The engine baseline model is trained and updated using historical data from healthy sensors.•Reasonable diagnostic thresholds are calculate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation Vol. 246; p. 116715
Main Authors: Han, Xinhao, Zhou, Xin, Lu, Feng, Huang, Jinquan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 31.03.2025
Subjects:
ISSN:0263-2241
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•A linear model is dynamically established based on the gradient change of the control variables from the sensor data, and a baseline model tracker is designed.•The engine baseline model is trained and updated using historical data from healthy sensors.•Reasonable diagnostic thresholds are calculated using the characteristics of historical data from healthy sensors.•The performance of four sensor fault threshold-setting methods is compared under various sensor fault modes. The varying operational parameters and random noise make it difficult to determine the fault diagnosis thresholds for engine sensors under different working conditions. Therefore, an adaptive threshold-based fault diagnosis method for aeroengine sensors is proposed. A multivariable control system based on the MFAC method is established for the aeroengine. The OS-ELM algorithm employs historical sensor data to train and update the engine baseline model. MFAC dynamically establishes a linear model based on the pseudo-gradient change of control variables from the current sensor data and designs a baseline model tracker to calculate reasonable diagnostic thresholds based on historical sensor data characteristics, thereby improving the efficiency of threshold calculation and diagnostic accuracy. The experimental results validate that this method improves the fault detection rate by at least 30% while ensuring a low false alarm rate, reduces the minimum detectable fault magnitude by 39%, and keeps the fault detection time within 0.2 s.
ISSN:0263-2241
DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2025.116715