A comparison study on anomaly detection methods in manufacturing process monitoring with X-ray images

Process monitoring and anomaly detection in manufacturing production systems are of vital importance in the consistency, reliability, and quality of manufacturing operations, which motivates the development of a large number of anomaly detection methods. In this work, a comparison study on represent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of intelligent manufacturing Vol. 36; no. 6; pp. 4389 - 4409
Main Authors: Huang, Congfang, Blondheim, David, Zhou, Shiyu
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01.08.2025
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
ISSN:0956-5515, 1572-8145
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Process monitoring and anomaly detection in manufacturing production systems are of vital importance in the consistency, reliability, and quality of manufacturing operations, which motivates the development of a large number of anomaly detection methods. In this work, a comparison study on representative unsupervised X-ray image based anomaly detection methods is conducted. Statistical, physical, and deep learning based dimension reduction methods and different anomaly detection criteria are considered and compared. Case studies on real-world X-ray image data with simulated anomalies and real anomalies are both carried out. Grey level co-occurrence matrix with Hotelling T 2 statistic as detection criteria achieves the best performance on the simulated anomalies case with an overall detection accuracy of 96%. Principal component analysis with reconstruction error as criteria obtains the highest detection rate of 90.6% in the real anomalies case. Considering the ever-growing availability of image data in intelligent manufacturing processes, this study will provide very useful knowledge and find a broad audience.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0956-5515
1572-8145
DOI:10.1007/s10845-024-02435-x