China's Neoliberal Authoritarian Social Policy

China is commonly regarded as a successful alternative to neoliberal economic policy and development strategy. But China's social policies, which were adopted at a pivotal global moment of postsocialist transition in the 1990s, bear significant traits one would associate with neoliberal economi...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	Social research Ročník 91; číslo 3; s. 751 - 775
Hlavný autor:	Frazier, Mark W
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	New York Johns Hopkins University Press 01.09.2024
Predmet:	Authoritarianism Beneficiaries Birth rate Cost control Development policy Development strategies Dominance Economic development Economic growth Economic policy Employees Employers GDP Gross Domestic Product Health care Health insurance Health services Households Ideology Local government Low income groups Neoliberalism Pensions Politics Postcommunist societies Retirement Rural areas Social development Social policy Social security Socialism Union membership Wage & price controls China
ISSN:	0037-783X, 1944-768X, 1944-768X
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Popis
Shrnutí:	China is commonly regarded as a successful alternative to neoliberal economic policy and development strategy. But China's social policies, which were adopted at a pivotal global moment of postsocialist transition in the 1990s, bear significant traits one would associate with neoliberal economic policy. This article uses the case of old age pensions to support this claim. Pension reforms of the early 2000s transferred unprecedented costs and risks to Chinese households under a new social insurance scheme. Twenty years later, the inherent flaws in financing healthcare and pensions through employer-financed and individualized social insurance have become apparent. The concluding section discusses Xi Jinping's dominance of Chinese politics and the risks and economic insecurities that have afflicted Chinese society under these neoliberal social policies.
Bibliografia:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14
ISSN:	0037-783X 1944-768X 1944-768X
DOI:	10.1353/sor.2024.a938576