Safe sets and in-dominating sets in digraphs

A non-empty subset S of the vertices of a digraph D is a safe set if (i) for every strongly connected component M of D−S, there exists a strongly connected component N of D[S] such that there exists an arc from M to N; and (ii) for every strongly connected component M of D−S and every strongly conne...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Discrete Applied Mathematics Jg. 346; S. 215 - 227
Hauptverfasser: Bai, Yandong, Bang-Jensen, Jørgen, Fujita, Shinya, Ono, Hirotaka, Yeo, Anders
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Elsevier B.V 31.03.2024
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0166-218X, 1872-6771
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A non-empty subset S of the vertices of a digraph D is a safe set if (i) for every strongly connected component M of D−S, there exists a strongly connected component N of D[S] such that there exists an arc from M to N; and (ii) for every strongly connected component M of D−S and every strongly connected component N of D[S], we have |M|≤|N| whenever there exists an arc from M to N. In the case of acyclic digraphs a set X of vertices is a safe set precisely when X is an in-dominating set, that is, every vertex not in X has at least one arc to X. We prove that, even for acyclic digraphs which are traceable (have a hamiltonian path) it is NP-hard to find a minimum cardinality safe (in-dominating) set. Then we show that the problem is also NP-hard for tournaments and give, for every positive constant c, a polynomial algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set in a tournament on n vertices in which no strong component has size more than clog(n). Under the so called Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) this is close to best possible in the following sense: If ETH holds, then, for every ϵ>0 there is no polynomial time algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set for the class of tournaments in which the largest strong component has size at most log1+ϵ(n). We also discuss bounds on the cardinality of safe sets in tournaments.
ISSN:0166-218X
1872-6771
DOI:10.1016/j.dam.2023.12.012