Early Changes in Billing and Notes After Evaluation and Management Guideline Change
The American Medical Association updated guidance in 2021 for frequently used billing codes for outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) visits. The intent was to account for provider time outside of face-to-face encounters and to reduce onerous documentation requirements. To analyze E/M visit use...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Annals of internal medicine Vol. 175; no. 4; p. 499 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
01.04.2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1539-3704, 1539-3704 |
| Online Access: | Get more information |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | The American Medical Association updated guidance in 2021 for frequently used billing codes for outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) visits. The intent was to account for provider time outside of face-to-face encounters and to reduce onerous documentation requirements.
To analyze E/M visit use, documentation length, and time spent in the electronic health record (EHR) before and after the guideline change.
Observational, retrospective, pre-post study.
U.S.-based ambulatory practices using the Epic Systems EHR.
303 547 advanced practice providers and physicians across 389 organizations.
Data from September 2020 through April 2021 containing weekly provider-level E/M code and EHR use metadata were extracted from the Epic Signal database. We descriptively analyzed overall and specialty-specific changes in E/M visit use, note length, and time spent in the EHR before and after the new guidelines using provider-level paired
tests.
Following the new guidelines, level 3 visits decreased by 2.41 percentage points (95% CI, -2.48 to -2.34 percentage points) to 38.5% of all E/M visits, a 5.9% relative decrease from fall 2020. Level 4 visits increased by 0.89 percentage points (CI, 0.82 to 0.96 percentage points) to 40.9% of E/M visits, a 2.2% relative increase. Level 5 visits (the highest acuity level) increased by 1.85 percentage points (CI, 1.81 to 1.89 percentage points) to 10.1% of E/M visits, a 22.6% relative increase. These changes varied by specialty. We found no meaningful changes in measures of note length or time spent in the EHR.
The Epic ambulatory client base may underrepresent smaller and independent practices.
Immediate changes in E/M coding contrast with null findings for changes in both note length and EHR time. Provider organizations are positioned to respond more rapidly to billing process changes than to changes in care delivery and associated EHR use behaviors. Fully realizing the intended benefits of this guideline change will require more time, facilitation, and scaling of best practices that more directly address EHR documentation practices and associated burden.
None. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The American Medical Association updated guidance in 2021 for frequently used billing codes for outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) visits. The intent was to account for provider time outside of face-to-face encounters and to reduce onerous documentation requirements.BACKGROUNDThe American Medical Association updated guidance in 2021 for frequently used billing codes for outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) visits. The intent was to account for provider time outside of face-to-face encounters and to reduce onerous documentation requirements.To analyze E/M visit use, documentation length, and time spent in the electronic health record (EHR) before and after the guideline change.OBJECTIVETo analyze E/M visit use, documentation length, and time spent in the electronic health record (EHR) before and after the guideline change.Observational, retrospective, pre-post study.DESIGNObservational, retrospective, pre-post study.U.S.-based ambulatory practices using the Epic Systems EHR.SETTINGU.S.-based ambulatory practices using the Epic Systems EHR.303 547 advanced practice providers and physicians across 389 organizations.PARTICIPANTS303 547 advanced practice providers and physicians across 389 organizations.Data from September 2020 through April 2021 containing weekly provider-level E/M code and EHR use metadata were extracted from the Epic Signal database. We descriptively analyzed overall and specialty-specific changes in E/M visit use, note length, and time spent in the EHR before and after the new guidelines using provider-level paired t tests.MEASUREMENTSData from September 2020 through April 2021 containing weekly provider-level E/M code and EHR use metadata were extracted from the Epic Signal database. We descriptively analyzed overall and specialty-specific changes in E/M visit use, note length, and time spent in the EHR before and after the new guidelines using provider-level paired t tests.Following the new guidelines, level 3 visits decreased by 2.41 percentage points (95% CI, -2.48 to -2.34 percentage points) to 38.5% of all E/M visits, a 5.9% relative decrease from fall 2020. Level 4 visits increased by 0.89 percentage points (CI, 0.82 to 0.96 percentage points) to 40.9% of E/M visits, a 2.2% relative increase. Level 5 visits (the highest acuity level) increased by 1.85 percentage points (CI, 1.81 to 1.89 percentage points) to 10.1% of E/M visits, a 22.6% relative increase. These changes varied by specialty. We found no meaningful changes in measures of note length or time spent in the EHR.RESULTSFollowing the new guidelines, level 3 visits decreased by 2.41 percentage points (95% CI, -2.48 to -2.34 percentage points) to 38.5% of all E/M visits, a 5.9% relative decrease from fall 2020. Level 4 visits increased by 0.89 percentage points (CI, 0.82 to 0.96 percentage points) to 40.9% of E/M visits, a 2.2% relative increase. Level 5 visits (the highest acuity level) increased by 1.85 percentage points (CI, 1.81 to 1.89 percentage points) to 10.1% of E/M visits, a 22.6% relative increase. These changes varied by specialty. We found no meaningful changes in measures of note length or time spent in the EHR.The Epic ambulatory client base may underrepresent smaller and independent practices.LIMITATIONThe Epic ambulatory client base may underrepresent smaller and independent practices.Immediate changes in E/M coding contrast with null findings for changes in both note length and EHR time. Provider organizations are positioned to respond more rapidly to billing process changes than to changes in care delivery and associated EHR use behaviors. Fully realizing the intended benefits of this guideline change will require more time, facilitation, and scaling of best practices that more directly address EHR documentation practices and associated burden.CONCLUSIONImmediate changes in E/M coding contrast with null findings for changes in both note length and EHR time. Provider organizations are positioned to respond more rapidly to billing process changes than to changes in care delivery and associated EHR use behaviors. Fully realizing the intended benefits of this guideline change will require more time, facilitation, and scaling of best practices that more directly address EHR documentation practices and associated burden.None.PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCENone. The American Medical Association updated guidance in 2021 for frequently used billing codes for outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) visits. The intent was to account for provider time outside of face-to-face encounters and to reduce onerous documentation requirements. To analyze E/M visit use, documentation length, and time spent in the electronic health record (EHR) before and after the guideline change. Observational, retrospective, pre-post study. U.S.-based ambulatory practices using the Epic Systems EHR. 303 547 advanced practice providers and physicians across 389 organizations. Data from September 2020 through April 2021 containing weekly provider-level E/M code and EHR use metadata were extracted from the Epic Signal database. We descriptively analyzed overall and specialty-specific changes in E/M visit use, note length, and time spent in the EHR before and after the new guidelines using provider-level paired tests. Following the new guidelines, level 3 visits decreased by 2.41 percentage points (95% CI, -2.48 to -2.34 percentage points) to 38.5% of all E/M visits, a 5.9% relative decrease from fall 2020. Level 4 visits increased by 0.89 percentage points (CI, 0.82 to 0.96 percentage points) to 40.9% of E/M visits, a 2.2% relative increase. Level 5 visits (the highest acuity level) increased by 1.85 percentage points (CI, 1.81 to 1.89 percentage points) to 10.1% of E/M visits, a 22.6% relative increase. These changes varied by specialty. We found no meaningful changes in measures of note length or time spent in the EHR. The Epic ambulatory client base may underrepresent smaller and independent practices. Immediate changes in E/M coding contrast with null findings for changes in both note length and EHR time. Provider organizations are positioned to respond more rapidly to billing process changes than to changes in care delivery and associated EHR use behaviors. Fully realizing the intended benefits of this guideline change will require more time, facilitation, and scaling of best practices that more directly address EHR documentation practices and associated burden. None. |
| Author | Apathy, Nate C Fendrich, Sarah Hare, Allison J Cross, Dori A |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Nate C orcidid: 0000-0002-7775-8544 surname: Apathy fullname: Apathy, Nate C organization: Perelman School of Medicine and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana (N.C.A.) – sequence: 2 givenname: Allison J orcidid: 0000-0002-7921-222X surname: Hare fullname: Hare, Allison J organization: Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (A.J.H., S.F.) – sequence: 3 givenname: Sarah orcidid: 0000-0001-6653-7407 surname: Fendrich fullname: Fendrich, Sarah organization: Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (A.J.H., S.F.) – sequence: 4 givenname: Dori A surname: Cross fullname: Cross, Dori A organization: Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (D.A.C.) |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35188791$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNULtOwzAUtVARfYDEFyCPLIFrO3GcsVSlILUwAHN0YzvFyHFKnCD176mgSEzn6LyGMyWj0AZLyCWDm1xwebvhLElT4CdkwjJRJCKHdPSPj8k0xg8AEIqrMzIWGVMqL9iEvCyx83u6eMewtZG6QO-c9y5sKQZDn9r-IM7r3nZ0-YV-wN614cfaYMCtbWzo6Wpwxh469jhzTk5r9NFeHHFG3u6Xr4uHZP28elzM14kWjPWJykzOgKsaCmlBoxYGIGNQyVyYlKG2WhohEVCiqXLNcmO01mmBNVRZUfMZuf7d3XXt52BjXzYuaus9BtsOseRSMCUlV9khenWMDlVjTbnrXIPdvvw7gn8Do_lfqQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acepjo_2024_100031 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acepjo_2024_100034 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamahealthforum_2023_0984 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocac211 crossref_primary_10_1001_jama_2023_0879 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jposna_2024_100113 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocac177 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamainternmed_2024_4123 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2025_28056 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_023_08428_5 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocac091 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_publhealth_071823_122832 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_025_09400_1 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2022_29504 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2480_4725 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOP_0000000000001261 crossref_primary_10_1111_1475_6773_14203 crossref_primary_10_1111_1475_6773_70038 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocad254 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamapediatrics_2024_1391 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocac120 crossref_primary_10_7326_M22_0355 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2367_8564 crossref_primary_10_1093_jncics_pkad066 crossref_primary_10_1002_lrh2_70001 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamiaopen_ooaf068 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamadermatol_2024_5286 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2024_26956 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocae156 crossref_primary_10_3389_fdgth_2022_1063141 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.7326/M21-4402 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1539-3704 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 35188791 |
| Genre | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: AHRQ HHS grantid: T32 HS026116 – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS grantid: UL1 TR002494 |
| GroupedDBID | --- ..I .55 .GJ .XZ 08G 1CY 23M 2WC 354 36B 39C 3O- 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE 5RS 6J9 7RV 7X7 88E 8C1 8F7 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8R4 8R5 AAKAS AAQOH AAQQT AARDX AAWTL ABBLC ABCQX ABDPE ABJNI ABOCM ABPMR ABUWG ACBNA ACGFO ACGFS ADBBV ADZCM AEGXH AENEX AERZD AETEA AFCHL AFFNX AFKRA AHJKT AHMBA AI. AIAGR ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQUVI ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN AZQEC BCR BCU BEC BENPR BKEYQ BKNYI BLC BPHCQ BTJBQ BVXVI BZLQD C1A C45 CCPQU CGR CUY CVF DWQXO E3Z EBS ECM EIF EJD EMB EMOBN EX3 F5P FEDTE FYUFA GNUQQ GUQSH H13 HMCUK HVGLF H~9 IH2 J5H K-O K9- L7B LPU M0R M0T M1P M2O M5~ MV1 MVM N4W NAPCQ NPM OBH OCB OFXIZ OGEVE OHH OHT OVD OVIDX P2P PCD PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X RWL RXW S0X SJFOW SJN SV3 TAE TEORI TPH TR2 TWZ UKHRP UKR VH1 VVN WH7 WOQ WOW X6Y X7M XOL YFH YOC YQJ YYP ZGI ZXP ZY1 ~H1 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-85d71028f096e0cac3d00510b673d41acec6d36a0a6adb7c17ddccc49af0b59f2 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 39 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000771992800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1539-3704 |
| IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 12:18:20 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:08:52 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c311t-85d71028f096e0cac3d00510b673d41acec6d36a0a6adb7c17ddccc49af0b59f2 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7775-8544 0000-0001-6653-7407 0000-0002-7921-222X |
| PMID | 35188791 |
| PQID | 2631866285 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2631866285 pubmed_primary_35188791 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-04-00 20220401 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2022 text: 2022-04-00 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Annals of internal medicine |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Ann Intern Med |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| References | 35188787 - Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):602-603. doi: 10.7326/M22-0355 |
| References_xml | – reference: 35188787 - Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):602-603. doi: 10.7326/M22-0355 |
| SSID | ssj0003828 |
| Score | 2.545342 |
| Snippet | The American Medical Association updated guidance in 2021 for frequently used billing codes for outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) visits. The intent... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 499 |
| SubjectTerms | Documentation Electronic Health Records Humans Medicine Physicians Retrospective Studies |
| Title | Early Changes in Billing and Notes After Evaluation and Management Guideline Change |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35188791 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2631866285 |
| Volume | 175 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000771992800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LSwMxEB7Uinjx_agvIngN3SS7m81JqrR6sEtBhd5KXgu97Fa39febZLf2JAhe9rJMCMNM8mUe3wDckchwTaXEJFERjpUgWApqsVKZYv7OlzY0Cr_wPM8mEzFuA251W1a5OhPDQW0q7WPkPZoyz81Gs-R-_oH91CifXW1HaGxChzko40u6-GTNFs6yMFvVObVwjhTFDfksd4ilN6Lu6RSHYMovwDJcMMP9_27tAPZaaIn6jS0cwoYtj2Bn1CbPj-E1kBmjpp-gRrMSPcwCIzeSpUF55UAn6vuR4WjwQwEefq1LZNDT0tNiueXaZU7gfTh4e3zG7UwFrBkhC5wlJmCKwj1dbKSlZib4pUo5MzGR2urUsFRGMpVGcU24MVrrWMgiUoko6ClslVVpzwHFjDEuJU1o4iRTm0XW4QEvXFhhEtGF25W6ps5mfSJClrZa1tO1wrpw1uh8Om_INabMM8RxQS7-IH0Ju9R3I4RCmivoFM5j7TVs66_FrP68Ccbgvvl49A3uer6n |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early+Changes+in+Billing+and+Notes+After+Evaluation+and+Management+Guideline+Change&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+internal+medicine&rft.au=Apathy%2C+Nate+C&rft.au=Hare%2C+Allison+J&rft.au=Fendrich%2C+Sarah&rft.au=Cross%2C+Dori+A&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.eissn=1539-3704&rft.volume=175&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=499&rft_id=info:doi/10.7326%2FM21-4402&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35188791&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35188791&rft.externalDocID=35188791 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1539-3704&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1539-3704&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1539-3704&client=summon |