Demonstratives and speaker stance in Thai

Demonstratives constitute a language universal. They are primarily spatial but can designate mental space, signaling the speaker's stances in discourse. In stance-taking, e.g., evaluating, positioning, and aligning, (inter)subjectivity plays an essential role. This paper addresses two sets of d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pragmatics Jg. 227; S. 19 - 36
Hauptverfasser: Khammee, Kultida, Liang-Itsara, Aphiwit, Rhee, Seongha
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Elsevier B.V 01.07.2024
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0378-2166, 1879-1387
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Demonstratives constitute a language universal. They are primarily spatial but can designate mental space, signaling the speaker's stances in discourse. In stance-taking, e.g., evaluating, positioning, and aligning, (inter)subjectivity plays an essential role. This paper addresses two sets of demonstrative-based discourse markers (DDMs) in Thai, i.e., those based on the proximal demonstrative nîi (▪) and the medial demonstrative nân (▪), focusing on their functions and positionality at left periphery (LP) and right periphery (RP). An examination of the functional distribution of eight DDMs in our Thai dataset reveals that the oft-cited LP/RP Functional Asymmetry Hypothesis is not supported. Further worth noting is that the Leftward Movement often said to be associated with subjectification (i.e., increasing subjectification pushes a word to move leftward) is not attested, or at least not observable, in the development of DDMs in Thai. •Thai has demonstrative-based discourse markers (DDMs).•DDMs developed from proximal and medial demonstratives.•DDMs carry diverse subjective and intersubjective functions.•The Functional Asymmetry Hypothesis is not supported by the DDM development.•The Leftward Movement Hypothesis is not supported in the DDM development.
ISSN:0378-2166
1879-1387
DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2024.04.011