The promise of foundational prudence: a response to our critics

Monteiro and Ruby respond to criticisms concerning their international relations (IR) theory and its relationship to the philosophy of science. They believe that a genuine post-foundational IR is possible only once we, as a discipline, recognize the inherent uncertainty of knowledge and the value of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	International theory Jg. 1; H. 3; S. 499 - 512
Hauptverfasser:	Monteiro, Nuno P., Ruby, Keven G.
Format:	Journal Article
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.11.2009
Schlagworte:	Attitudes Constructivism Debates International Relations Knowledge Philosophers Philosophy Philosophy of science Political Science Research Political Science Theories Political theory Pragmatism Science Symposium on ‘Who needs Philosophy of Science, anyway?’ Uncertainty Validity
ISSN:	1752-9719, 1752-9727
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!