Mechanical verification of Lamport’s Bakery algorithm

Proof assistants like PVS can be used fruitfully for the design and verification of concurrent algorithms. The technique is presented here by applying it to Lamport’s Bakery algorithm. The proofs for safety properties such as mutual exclusion, first-come–first-served, and absence of deadlock are bas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science of computer programming Jg. 78; H. 9; S. 1622 - 1638
1. Verfasser: Hesselink, Wim H.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Elsevier B.V 01.09.2013
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0167-6423, 1872-7964
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Proof assistants like PVS can be used fruitfully for the design and verification of concurrent algorithms. The technique is presented here by applying it to Lamport’s Bakery algorithm. The proofs for safety properties such as mutual exclusion, first-come–first-served, and absence of deadlock are based on invariants. The argument for liveness (progress) is given in a set-theoretic version of temporal logic. Liveness requires the assumption of weak fairness and holds only for executions with not more than finitely many fault steps per process. The condition of finitely many faults can be removed by postulating strong fairness. The algorithm and its verification are extended to allow unboundedly many processes, by means of expandable arrays and weak atomic snapshots. •Lamport’s Bakery algorithm is verified with the proof assistant PVS.•The first-come–first-served property is verified with a history variable.•Progress is verified in linear-time temporal logic.•Only weak assumptions on fairness and fault tolerance are needed.•It is allowed that new processes arrive.
ISSN:0167-6423
1872-7964
DOI:10.1016/j.scico.2013.03.003