Cooperative Operation Optimization of Flexible Interconnected Distribution Networks Considering Demand Response
The integration of renewable energy into distribution networks has led to voltage violations and increased network losses. Traditional control devices, with slow response, struggle to precisely control power flow in active distribution networks (ADNs). Optimizing from both supply and demand sides, a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Processes Jg. 13; H. 9; S. 2809 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Basel
MDPI AG
02.09.2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 2227-9717, 2227-9717 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | The integration of renewable energy into distribution networks has led to voltage violations and increased network losses. Traditional control devices, with slow response, struggle to precisely control power flow in active distribution networks (ADNs). Optimizing from both supply and demand sides, an ADN power flow optimization method is proposed for accurate and dynamic power flow regulation to address these issues. On the demand side, the peak, valley, and flat periods are divided by the fuzzy transitive closure method. Balancing user satisfaction maximization and load fluctuation minimization, time-of-use (TOU) prices are solved by the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). On the supply side, operating cost and voltage deviation minimization are objectives, with a proposed optimization method coordinating precise continuous regulation devices and low-cost discrete ones. After second-order cone programming and linearization, the multi-objective model is solved via the normalized normal constraint (NNC) algorithm to get a solution set, from which the optimal solution is selected using Entropy Weight and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (EW-TOPSIS). The results indicate that, in comparison with the proposed method, ADN not implementing demand-side TOU pricing strategies exhibits an increase in operating costs by 13.83% and a rise in voltage deviation by 4.14%. Meanwhile, ADN utilizing only traditional discrete control devices demonstrates more significant increments, with operating costs increasing by 182.40% and voltage deviation rising by 113.02%. |
|---|---|
| Bibliographie: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 2227-9717 2227-9717 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/pr13092809 |