Exact Separation of Forbidden-Set Cuts Associated With Redundant Parity Checks of Binary Linear Codes

In recent years, several integer programming (IP) approaches were developed for maximum-likelihood decoding and minimum distance computation for binary linear codes. Two aspects in particular have been demonstrated to improve the performance of IP solvers as well as adaptive linear programming decod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE communications letters Vol. 24; no. 10; pp. 2096 - 2099
Main Authors: Puchert, Christian, Tillmann, Andreas M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York IEEE 01.10.2020
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects:
ISSN:1089-7798, 1558-2558
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In recent years, several integer programming (IP) approaches were developed for maximum-likelihood decoding and minimum distance computation for binary linear codes. Two aspects in particular have been demonstrated to improve the performance of IP solvers as well as adaptive linear programming decoders: the dynamic generation of forbidden-set (FS) inequalities, a family of valid cutting planes, and the utilization of so-called redundant parity-checks (RPCs). However, to date, it had remained unclear how to determine whether or not there exists any violated FS inequality w.r.t. any known or unknown parity-check. In this note, we prove NP -hardness of this RPC separation problem. Moreover, we formulate an IP model that combines the search for most violated FS cuts with the generation of RPCs, and report on computational experiments. Empirically, for various instances of the minimum distance problem, it turns out that while utilizing the exact separation IP does not appear to provide a computational advantage, it can apparently be avoided altogether by combining heuristics to generate RPC-based cuts.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1089-7798
1558-2558
DOI:10.1109/LCOMM.2020.3000046