Variability in SHBG assays and the effect thereof on calculated estimates of free testosterone

BackgroundSerum free testosterone is commonly used as a parameter to evaluate testosterone exposure and is mostly calculated using mathematical approximations. As the principal testosterone-binding protein, SHBG concentration is always included in such calculations. However, variability in SHBG meas...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Annals of clinical biochemistry Ročník 62; číslo 6; s. 493
Hlavní autoři: Walravens, Joeri, Adaway, Joanne, Reyns, Tim, Narinx, Nick, Nyamaah, Jennifer Afrakoma, Antonio, Leen, Kaufman, Jean-Marc, Keevil, Brian, Fiers, Tom, Lapauw, Bruno
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England 01.11.2025
Témata:
ISSN:1758-1001, 1758-1001
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract BackgroundSerum free testosterone is commonly used as a parameter to evaluate testosterone exposure and is mostly calculated using mathematical approximations. As the principal testosterone-binding protein, SHBG concentration is always included in such calculations. However, variability in SHBG measurements may affect reported SHBG levels and consequently free testosterone calculations. In this study, we re-evaluate the effects of SHBG assay choice and interlaboratory variability on calculated free testosterone (cFT).MethodsSerum samples from 113 men and 106 women were collected. SHBG levels were measured using three different SHBG immunoassays (Roche, Abbott and Siemens). Testosterone levels were measured using LC-MS/MS. Afterwards, cFT was calculated using the Vermeulen formula and measured directly. SHBG concentrations, and derived cFT concentrations, from different assays were compared. To simulate interlaboratory SHBG variability, measured levels were modified by 15% after which cFT was recalculated using the Vermeulen, Ly, Sartorius and Södergard formulae. The proportions of diagnoses of hypogonadism or hyperandrogenism were compared.ResultsAssessed SHBG assays showed very good conformity. The largest difference was 7%, between the Abbott and Siemens assay. The difference in cFT levels was at most 3% between the Abbott and Siemens assay. Interlaboratory variability affected the proportion of diagnoses depending on the used formula.ConclusionsOur results do not show large differences between SHBG assays and only minor effects on cFT levels. Therefore, SHBG assay choice is not expected to greatly influence clinical decision making. In contrast, interlaboratory variation in SHBG measurements and choice of formula might considerably affect cFT results and their interpretation.
AbstractList BackgroundSerum free testosterone is commonly used as a parameter to evaluate testosterone exposure and is mostly calculated using mathematical approximations. As the principal testosterone-binding protein, SHBG concentration is always included in such calculations. However, variability in SHBG measurements may affect reported SHBG levels and consequently free testosterone calculations. In this study, we re-evaluate the effects of SHBG assay choice and interlaboratory variability on calculated free testosterone (cFT).MethodsSerum samples from 113 men and 106 women were collected. SHBG levels were measured using three different SHBG immunoassays (Roche, Abbott and Siemens). Testosterone levels were measured using LC-MS/MS. Afterwards, cFT was calculated using the Vermeulen formula and measured directly. SHBG concentrations, and derived cFT concentrations, from different assays were compared. To simulate interlaboratory SHBG variability, measured levels were modified by 15% after which cFT was recalculated using the Vermeulen, Ly, Sartorius and Södergard formulae. The proportions of diagnoses of hypogonadism or hyperandrogenism were compared.ResultsAssessed SHBG assays showed very good conformity. The largest difference was 7%, between the Abbott and Siemens assay. The difference in cFT levels was at most 3% between the Abbott and Siemens assay. Interlaboratory variability affected the proportion of diagnoses depending on the used formula.ConclusionsOur results do not show large differences between SHBG assays and only minor effects on cFT levels. Therefore, SHBG assay choice is not expected to greatly influence clinical decision making. In contrast, interlaboratory variation in SHBG measurements and choice of formula might considerably affect cFT results and their interpretation.
BackgroundSerum free testosterone is commonly used as a parameter to evaluate testosterone exposure and is mostly calculated using mathematical approximations. As the principal testosterone-binding protein, SHBG concentration is always included in such calculations. However, variability in SHBG measurements may affect reported SHBG levels and consequently free testosterone calculations. In this study, we re-evaluate the effects of SHBG assay choice and interlaboratory variability on calculated free testosterone (cFT).MethodsSerum samples from 113 men and 106 women were collected. SHBG levels were measured using three different SHBG immunoassays (Roche, Abbott and Siemens). Testosterone levels were measured using LC-MS/MS. Afterwards, cFT was calculated using the Vermeulen formula and measured directly. SHBG concentrations, and derived cFT concentrations, from different assays were compared. To simulate interlaboratory SHBG variability, measured levels were modified by 15% after which cFT was recalculated using the Vermeulen, Ly, Sartorius and Södergard formulae. The proportions of diagnoses of hypogonadism or hyperandrogenism were compared.ResultsAssessed SHBG assays showed very good conformity. The largest difference was 7%, between the Abbott and Siemens assay. The difference in cFT levels was at most 3% between the Abbott and Siemens assay. Interlaboratory variability affected the proportion of diagnoses depending on the used formula.ConclusionsOur results do not show large differences between SHBG assays and only minor effects on cFT levels. Therefore, SHBG assay choice is not expected to greatly influence clinical decision making. In contrast, interlaboratory variation in SHBG measurements and choice of formula might considerably affect cFT results and their interpretation.BackgroundSerum free testosterone is commonly used as a parameter to evaluate testosterone exposure and is mostly calculated using mathematical approximations. As the principal testosterone-binding protein, SHBG concentration is always included in such calculations. However, variability in SHBG measurements may affect reported SHBG levels and consequently free testosterone calculations. In this study, we re-evaluate the effects of SHBG assay choice and interlaboratory variability on calculated free testosterone (cFT).MethodsSerum samples from 113 men and 106 women were collected. SHBG levels were measured using three different SHBG immunoassays (Roche, Abbott and Siemens). Testosterone levels were measured using LC-MS/MS. Afterwards, cFT was calculated using the Vermeulen formula and measured directly. SHBG concentrations, and derived cFT concentrations, from different assays were compared. To simulate interlaboratory SHBG variability, measured levels were modified by 15% after which cFT was recalculated using the Vermeulen, Ly, Sartorius and Södergard formulae. The proportions of diagnoses of hypogonadism or hyperandrogenism were compared.ResultsAssessed SHBG assays showed very good conformity. The largest difference was 7%, between the Abbott and Siemens assay. The difference in cFT levels was at most 3% between the Abbott and Siemens assay. Interlaboratory variability affected the proportion of diagnoses depending on the used formula.ConclusionsOur results do not show large differences between SHBG assays and only minor effects on cFT levels. Therefore, SHBG assay choice is not expected to greatly influence clinical decision making. In contrast, interlaboratory variation in SHBG measurements and choice of formula might considerably affect cFT results and their interpretation.
Author Reyns, Tim
Narinx, Nick
Kaufman, Jean-Marc
Lapauw, Bruno
Antonio, Leen
Keevil, Brian
Fiers, Tom
Walravens, Joeri
Adaway, Joanne
Nyamaah, Jennifer Afrakoma
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Joeri
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5159-3238
  surname: Walravens
  fullname: Walravens, Joeri
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University & Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Joanne
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4352-3410
  surname: Adaway
  fullname: Adaway, Joanne
  organization: Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Tim
  surname: Reyns
  fullname: Reyns, Tim
  organization: Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Nick
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7342-8724
  surname: Narinx
  fullname: Narinx, Nick
  organization: Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven Leuven, Belgium
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jennifer Afrakoma
  surname: Nyamaah
  fullname: Nyamaah, Jennifer Afrakoma
  organization: Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven Leuven, Belgium
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Leen
  surname: Antonio
  fullname: Antonio, Leen
  organization: Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven Leuven, Belgium
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Jean-Marc
  surname: Kaufman
  fullname: Kaufman, Jean-Marc
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University & Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Brian
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0684-9318
  surname: Keevil
  fullname: Keevil, Brian
  organization: Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Tom
  surname: Fiers
  fullname: Fiers, Tom
  organization: Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Bruno
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1584-4965
  surname: Lapauw
  fullname: Lapauw, Bruno
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University & Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40500910$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkEtLxDAQgIOsuA_9AV4kRy_VSZpHe9Rl3RUWPPg4WpJ2gpVuuybpYf-9EVfwNB_Mx_AxczLphx4JuWRww5jWtwAgpMo5lyyXoLQ6ITOmZZExADb5x1MyD-Ez6VwDnJGpAAlQMpiR9zfjW2Pbro0H2vb0eXO_piYEcwjU9A2NH0jROazjD3ocHB16WpuuHjsTsaEYYrtLFGhaOY9IE8chRPQp9pycOtMFvDjOBXl9WL0sN9n2af24vNtmNS9FzCQrlbJWSymdhJyXRghs0IEtpEDDeKnrvEmu1bmSpUIokJmyQSW0NYXjC3L9e3fvh68xBVS7NtTYdabHYQxVzlnBpOIFJPXqqI52h02196nfH6q_n_BvD9xlJQ
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1177/00045632251350676
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Chemistry
EISSN 1758-1001
ExternalDocumentID 40500910
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.55
.GJ
0R~
23M
35A
36B
4.4
53G
5GY
5I-
5I.
5RE
5VS
6J9
7X7
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8CJ
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
AACMV
AACTG
AAEWN
AAGMC
AAJIQ
AAJOX
AAKGS
AAQXH
AATBZ
AAUAS
AAWTL
AAXOT
AAXTJ
AAYTG
AAZBJ
ABDWY
ABHKI
ABJCF
ABJIS
ABJZC
ABLUO
ABPGX
ABUJY
ABUWG
ABVVC
ABWRX
ACFEJ
ACFIC
ACFMA
ACFYK
ACGBL
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACGZN
ACGZU
ACIWK
ACJOP
ACJTF
ACLFY
ACLHI
ACPRK
ACUAV
ACXMB
ADBBV
ADEBD
ADMPF
ADNBR
ADTBJ
ADWAY
AECGH
AECVZ
AEDTQ
AEKYL
AEMJX
AENEX
AEPTA
AEWDL
AEWLI
AEXFG
AFEGE
AFFHD
AFIEG
AFKRA
AFKRG
AFNTS
AGHKR
AGPXR
AGWFA
AHDMH
AHMBA
AHOKE
AI.
AIGRN
AIIQI
AJABX
AJEFB
AJMMQ
AJSCY
AJUZI
AJXAJ
ALKWR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMCVQ
AOSDY
ARTOV
AYAKG
AZQEC
BBNVY
BBRGL
BENPR
BES
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKIIM
BPACV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
BWJAD
CAG
CCPQU
CF.
CGR
COF
CORYS
CQQTX
CS3
CUTAK
CUY
CVF
D1I
D1J
DB0
DC.
DC0
DD-
DE-
DF0
DN0
DO-
DWQXO
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
FHBDP
FYUFA
GNUQQ
H13
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HZ~
J5H
J8X
KB.
LK8
M1P
M2P
M2Q
M7P
MV1
NPM
O9-
P.B
P.C
P2P
PDBOC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q1R
Q2X
ROL
RWL
RXW
S0X
SAUOL
SCNPE
SFC
SHG
SPQ
SPV
TAE
TRM
UKHRP
VH1
WH7
X6Y
X7M
ZXP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-51966bb7555f50329a44edef0b854ea1297c3dc29b736596e08e1a9de647ba8f2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 0
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001506756500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1758-1001
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 22:36:39 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 29 02:16:21 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords SHBG
free testosterone
immunoassay
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c294t-51966bb7555f50329a44edef0b854ea1297c3dc29b736596e08e1a9de647ba8f2
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-7342-8724
0000-0002-0684-9318
0000-0003-4352-3410
0000-0002-1584-4965
0000-0001-5159-3238
PMID 40500910
PQID 3218156280
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3218156280
pubmed_primary_40500910
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Annals of clinical biochemistry
PublicationTitleAlternate Ann Clin Biochem
PublicationYear 2025
SSID ssj0002700
Score 2.4336288
Snippet BackgroundSerum free testosterone is commonly used as a parameter to evaluate testosterone exposure and is mostly calculated using mathematical approximations....
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 493
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Chromatography, Liquid
Female
Humans
Hyperandrogenism - blood
Hyperandrogenism - diagnosis
Hypogonadism - blood
Hypogonadism - diagnosis
Immunoassay - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin - analysis
Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin - metabolism
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Testosterone - blood
Title Variability in SHBG assays and the effect thereof on calculated estimates of free testosterone
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40500910
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3218156280
Volume 62
WOSCitedRecordID wos001506756500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpZ1bS8MwFMeDOlFfvMzbvBHB12LXpEnzJDqce9kYeGFPjqRJYA-2c53Cvr3ntB17EgRfSqAX2uQ055ec5PwJuRFcOWG1DABG04AzpwOtNIAczkBa64VUuhSbkINBMhqpYT3hVtTLKpd9YtlR2zzFOfJbhr4InHUS3k0_A1SNwuhqLaGxThoMUAatWo5W2cKjagsKeEhMYRq266hmmXCpZBm05jaLoccWvxNm6Wm6e_99x32yWzMmva-M4oCsuaxJtjtLabcm2erXEfVD8v4Gg-UqV_eCTjL63Ht4ogDUelFQnVkKfEirNR9YnLnc0zyj0LC4fhVolWKWjg8EVgqn_Mw5OkexGsy_kGfuiLx2H186vaDWXAjSSPF5AEAnhDEyjmMfhyxSmnNnnQ9NEnOngQ5kyixcayQTsRIuTFxbK-sEl0YnPjomGxk8_pRQ5iUzaSRsyB1PAcSUiaBobaJDY6K0Ra6XtTiG78dAhc5c_lWMV_XYIidVU4ynVfKNMQBmiIxz9oe7z8lOhHK95dbBC9Lw8Ee7S7KZfs8nxeyqNBY4Dob9H8ryyHs
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability+in+SHBG+assays+and+the+effect+thereof+on+calculated+estimates+of+free+testosterone&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+clinical+biochemistry&rft.au=Walravens%2C+Joeri&rft.au=Adaway%2C+Joanne&rft.au=Reyns%2C+Tim&rft.au=Narinx%2C+Nick&rft.date=2025-11-01&rft.issn=1758-1001&rft.eissn=1758-1001&rft.spage=45632251350676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F00045632251350676&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1758-1001&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1758-1001&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1758-1001&client=summon