Global complexity signatures of solar cycles: A unified Entropy-Fractal survey of OMNI solar wind data (1964–2025)
Traditional solar-cycle studies emphasize amplitude- and duration-based indicators, overlooking the intrinsic complexity of heliospheric fluctuations. Entropy- and fractal-based descriptors offer complementary insight, but a cycle-resolved assessment across multiple observables has been missing. Usi...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Advances in space research Ročník 76; číslo 11; s. 7190 - 7204 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Elsevier B.V
01.12.2025
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 0273-1177 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Shrnutí: | Traditional solar-cycle studies emphasize amplitude- and duration-based indicators, overlooking the intrinsic complexity of heliospheric fluctuations. Entropy- and fractal-based descriptors offer complementary insight, but a cycle-resolved assessment across multiple observables has been missing.
Using daily OMNI-2 data (1964–2025), we segment each solar cycle (20–25) into ascending and descending phases and compute eleven global complexity measures per cycle–phase segment for ten solar-wind and geomagnetic observables. The metrics cover information content (Shannon, spectral), dynamical regularity (approximate, sample, permutation), geometric roughness (Higuchi, Katz, Petrosian), algorithmic novelty (Lempel–Ziv), and long-range memory (Hurst). We analyse redundancy and physical linkages via correlations and principal-component analysis (PCA), and quantify within-cycle phase contrasts using paired nonparametric tests with bootstrap effect sizes. Cycle parity is tested with permutation-based linear models controlling for the physical variable.
Two orthogonal axes summarize the landscape: an amplitude–breadth direction (dominated by Shannon/spectral entropy) and a temporal-irregularity direction (ordinal entropies and Higuchi), while Lempel–Ziv forms an almost independent third dimension. Crucially, phase—not odd/even parity—organizes the dominant variability: ascending halves maximize multiscale roughness, whereas descending halves show broader amplitude dispersion and higher algorithmic novelty. Cross-metric–observable maps tie these facets to known regimes: fast streams and composition-rich intervals (e.g., larger α/p) raise ordinal richness and LZ; storm-time geomagnetic response (Dst, Kp) aligns with anti-persistence and space-filling trajectories.
Global complexity metrics expose physically distinct regimes of the solar wind–magnetosphere system that are invisible to amplitude statistics. The phase-resolved design clarifies that cycle phase is the primary driver of global complexity, providing a compact feature space for sliding-window predictors in space-weather applications. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0273-1177 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.asr.2025.09.072 |