Optimal Complexity Architectures for Pipelined Distributed Arithmetic-Based LMS Adaptive Filter

This paper presents three optimal-complexity structures (I, II, III) for pipelined distributed arithmetic (DA) based least-mean-square (LMS) adaptive filter. The complexity of proposed structures is reduced by implementing offset-binary-coding (OBC) combinations of input samples on hardware. However...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on circuits and systems. I, Regular papers Jg. 66; H. 2; S. 630 - 642
Hauptverfasser: Khan, Mohd. Tasleem, Shaik, Rafi Ahamed
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: New York IEEE 01.02.2019
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1549-8328, 1558-0806
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper presents three optimal-complexity structures (I, II, III) for pipelined distributed arithmetic (DA) based least-mean-square (LMS) adaptive filter. The complexity of proposed structures is reduced by implementing offset-binary-coding (OBC) combinations of input samples on hardware. However, some non-OBC outputs are produced, and subsequently eliminated in the error computation during the initial clock cycles. For achieving more performance benefits, radix-4 OBC combinations of input samples are implemented with the proposed partial product generators. In addition, novel low-complexity implementations for the offset term, weight update block and shift-accumulate unit are also proposed. Analysis shows that byte-complexity of proposed structures vary linearly with the order of DA base unit, while their bit-complexity depends on the topology. All the structures show significant hardware savings, Structure-I has least critical-path and Structure-II, III offer superior convergence performance. Experimental results show that the Structure-I, II and III with 32 nd order filter provide savings 71.13%, 71.83% and 73.08% in area, 68.47%, 70.01% and 72.17% in power, 51.74%, 37.83% and 45.38% in area-per-throughput (APT), 47.33%, 33.72% and 43.19% in power-per-throughput (PPT), 55.11%, 59.66% and 64.20% in slice LUTs, 35.33%, 40.28% and 44.87% in flip-flops over the best existing scheme.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1549-8328
1558-0806
DOI:10.1109/TCSI.2018.2867291