Harnessing Generative Modeling and Autoencoders Against Adversarial Threats in Autonomous Vehicles
The safety and security of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) have been an active area of interest and study in recent years. To enable human behavior, Deep Learning (DL) and Machine Learning (ML) models are extensively used to make accurate decisions. However, the DL and ML models are susceptible to various...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on consumer electronics Jg. 70; H. 3; S. 6216 - 6223 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York
IEEE
01.08.2024
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0098-3063, 1558-4127 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | The safety and security of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) have been an active area of interest and study in recent years. To enable human behavior, Deep Learning (DL) and Machine Learning (ML) models are extensively used to make accurate decisions. However, the DL and ML models are susceptible to various attacks, like adversarial attacks, leading to miscalculated decisions. Existing solutions defend against adversarial attacks proactively or reactively. To improve the defense methodologies, we propose a novel hybrid Defense Strategy for Autonomous Vehicles against Adversarial Attacks (DSAA), incorporating both reactive and proactive measures with adversarial training with Neural Structured Learning (NSL) and a generative denoising autoencoder to remove the adversarial perturbations. In addition, a randomized channel that adds calculated noise to the model parameter is utilized to encounter white-box and black-box attacks. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed DSAA effectively mitigates proactive and reactive attacks compared to other existing defense methods, showcasing its performance by achieving an average accuracy of 80.15%. |
|---|---|
| Bibliographie: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0098-3063 1558-4127 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/TCE.2024.3437419 |