A Systematic Literature Review of User Evaluation in Immersive Analytics

User evaluation is a common and useful tool for systematically generating knowledge and validating novel approaches in the domain of Immersive Analytics. Since this research domain centres around users, user evaluation is of extraordinary relevance. Additionally, Immersive Analytics is an interdisci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computer graphics forum Vol. 43; no. 3
Main Authors: Friedl‐Knirsch, J., Pointecker, F., Pfistermüller, S., Stach, C., Anthes, C., Roth, D.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2024
Subjects:
CCS Concepts
General and reference → Surveys and overviews
Human‐centered computing → Visual analytics
Literature reviews
Visualization design and evaluation methods
ISSN:0167-7055, 1467-8659
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:User evaluation is a common and useful tool for systematically generating knowledge and validating novel approaches in the domain of Immersive Analytics. Since this research domain centres around users, user evaluation is of extraordinary relevance. Additionally, Immersive Analytics is an interdisciplinary field of research where different communities bring in their own methodologies. It is vital to investigate and synchronise these different approaches with the long‐term goal to reach a shared evaluation framework. While there have been several studies focusing on Immersive Analytics as a whole or on certain aspects of the domain, this is the first systematic review of the state of evaluation methodology in Immersive Analytics. The main objective of this systematic literature review is to illustrate methodologies and research areas that are still underrepresented in user studies by identifying current practice in user evaluation in the domain of Immersive Analytics in coherence with the PRISMA protocol. (see https://www.acm.org/publications/class-2012)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0167-7055
1467-8659
DOI:10.1111/cgf.15111