A generalized Shapley index-based interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy PROMETHEE method for group decision-making

Multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problems, where correlations commonly exist among input arguments, are becoming increasingly complex. However, most of the existing consensus-reaching methods for MCGDM problems fail to adequately consider the effects of these interactions among criteria...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soft computing (Berlin, Germany) Vol. 27; no. 10; pp. 6629 - 6652
Main Authors: Hua, Zhen, Jing, Xiaochuan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.05.2023
Subjects:
ISSN:1432-7643, 1433-7479
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problems, where correlations commonly exist among input arguments, are becoming increasingly complex. However, most of the existing consensus-reaching methods for MCGDM problems fail to adequately consider the effects of these interactions among criteria and experts, which may bring about inaccurate results. Therefore, this paper establishes a novel MCGDM framework based on the generalized Shapley value to solve the consensus-reaching problem with interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets (IVPFS). First, experts’ evaluations are collected using IVPFS, which offers a more flexible way to express this vague information. Second, the interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy Choquet integral operator and the interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy Shapley aggregation operator are developed to fuse the decision information with complementary, redundant, or independent characteristics. Third, an integrated consensus-reaching algorithm is established to improve group consensus by iteratively updating the evaluations until the group consensus level reaches the preset threshold. Then, the classical PROMETHEE method is extended using the generalized Shapley value within an IVPFS context to derive a more scientific ranking result. Finally, a case study for a sustainable supplier evaluation problem is presented to validate the proposed method. The results and comparative analysis show that the proposed method can represent experts’ evaluations more flexibly, integrate inputs with interrelationships more effectively, and improve group consensus more efficiently.
ISSN:1432-7643
1433-7479
DOI:10.1007/s00500-023-07842-5