Almost disjunctive list-decoding codes
We say that an s -subset of codewords of a binary code X is s L -bad in X if there exists an L -subset of other codewords in X whose disjunctive sum is covered by the disjunctive sum of the given s codewords. Otherwise, this s -subset of codewords is said to be s L -good in X . A binary code X is sa...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Problems of information transmission Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 110 - 131 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Moscow
Pleiades Publishing
01.04.2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0032-9460, 1608-3253 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | We say that an
s
-subset of codewords of a binary code
X
is
s
L
-bad in
X
if there exists an
L
-subset of other codewords in
X
whose disjunctive sum is covered by the disjunctive sum of the given
s
codewords. Otherwise, this
s
-subset of codewords is said to be
s
L
-good in
X
. A binary code
X
is said to be a list-decoding disjunctive code of strength
s
and list size
L
(an
s
L
-LD code) if it does not contain
s
L
-bad subsets of codewords. We consider a
probabilistic
generalization of
s
L
-LD codes; namely, we say that a code
X
is an
almost disjunctive s
L
-
LD code
if the
fraction
of
s
L
-good subsets of codewords in
X
is close to 1. Using the random coding method on the ensemble of binary constant-weight codes, we establish lower bounds on the capacity and error exponent of almost disjunctive
s
L
-LD codes. For this ensemble, the obtained lower bounds are tight and show that the capacity of almost disjunctive
s
L
-LD codes is greater than the zero-error capacity of disjunctive
s
L
-LD codes. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0032-9460 1608-3253 |
| DOI: | 10.1134/S0032946015020039 |