Chasing the objective upper eyelid symmetry formula; R2, RMSE, POC, MAE, and MSE

Purpose Investigate the most appropriate mathematical formula to objectively express upper eyelid contour symmetry. Methods 62 eyes of 31 patients were included in the study. The upper eyelid contour symmetry of the patients was classified subjectively (independent of MRD1) as poor, acceptable, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International ophthalmology Jg. 44; H. 1; S. 303
Hauptverfasser: Serefoglu Cabuk, Kubra, Cengiz, Said Kemal, Guler, Mehmet Guray, Topcu, Husna, Cetin Efe, Ayse, Ulas, Mehmet Goksel, Poslu Karademir, Fatma
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 02.07.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Schlagworte:
Algorithms
Contours
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Curves
Eyelid
Mathematical models
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Ophthalmology
Original Paper
Root-mean-square errors
Surgeons
Symmetry
MAE
R
POC
RMSE
MSE
Upper eyelid
Symmetry
ISSN:1573-2630, 0165-5701, 1573-2630
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Investigate the most appropriate mathematical formula to objectively express upper eyelid contour symmetry. Methods 62 eyes of 31 patients were included in the study. The upper eyelid contour symmetry of the patients was classified subjectively (independent of MRD1) as poor, acceptable, and good by three oculoplastic specialists (senior, expert, and junior surgeon). Bézier curves of the upper lid contour were drawn with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MA, USA). Using the algorithms created by Author SKC in Spyder (Python 3.7.9.), the symmetry of the Bézier curves of the left eyelids were obtained according to the y-axis, and the mid-pupils of both eyes were superimposed. The lower curve moved vertically to the equal height of the other curve to equalize MRD1’s. R 2 (Coefficient of determination), RMSE (Root-mean-square error), MSE (Mean squared error), POC (Percentage of co-efficiency), and MAE (Mean absolute error) were calculated. We evaluated the correlation between these objective formulas and the subjective grading of three surgeons using Spearman’s rho (ρ). Results The correlation coefficient of RMSE and MSE were the same for all surgeons grading. There was a strong correlation between the senior surgeon’s subjective scoring (N; poor = 8, acceptable = 16, good = 8) and R 2 , RMSE, POC, MAE (ρ = 0.643, p  < 0.001, ρ = −0.607, p < 0.001, ρ = 0.562, p  < 0.001, ρ = −0.517, p  < 0.001, respectively). We found a strong relationship between the expert surgeon’s subjective scoring (N; poor = 9, acceptable = 13, good:10) and R 2 (ρ = 0.611, p  < 0.001), RMSE (ρ = −0.549, p  < 0.001), POC (ρ = 0.511, p  < 0.001), and MAE (ρ = −0.450, p  < 0.05). We found a strong correlation between junior surgeon’s subjective scoring (N; poor = 6, acceptable = 18, good = 8) and R 2 , RMSE, and POC (ρ: −0.517, p  < 0.001; ρ: −0.470, p  < 0.001; ρ: 0.521, p  < 0.001; respectively) and moderate correlation between MAE (ρ:-0.394, p  < 0.05). The highest correlation is observed with R 2 . Conclusions RMSE, MSE, POC, MAE, and especially R 2 , may quantitatively express upper eyelid contour symmetry, comparable with the oculoplastic surgeon. The highest correlation was observed between the senior surgeon and R 2 , and decreases with the experience of the surgeon.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1573-2630
0165-5701
1573-2630
DOI:10.1007/s10792-024-03157-y