Categorical confusions: gender and the colonial construction of the ‘Chinese Buddhist’ in Burma

British law in colonial Burma separated the legal personhood of imperial subjects by religious status. However, colonial law failed to clarify boundaries around religious categories. This lack of clarity was amplified when the court was forced to consider how to apply Buddhist law between different...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis Ročník 55; číslo 3; s. 430 - 452
Hlavný autor: Venker, Matthew
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Abingdon Taylor & Francis Ltd 02.09.2023
Predmet:
Anthropology
Asian cultural groups
Buddhists
Colonialism
Courts
Disenfranchisement
Divorce
Family law
Gender
Historical anthropology
Judiciary
Law
Marriage
Migrants
Personhood
Succession
ISSN:2770-6869, 2770-6877
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:British law in colonial Burma separated the legal personhood of imperial subjects by religious status. However, colonial law failed to clarify boundaries around religious categories. This lack of clarity was amplified when the court was forced to consider how to apply Buddhist law between different Buddhist communities, like the Chinese and Burmese. Owing to differences in how marriage, divorce, succession, and other rights are handled in Chinese- versus Burmese legal traditions, recognition as either Chinese or Burmese carried significant weight. Through a historical anthropology of Chinese-Burmese Buddhist family law in colonial Burma, this article argues that the British colonial judiciary’s failure to appreciate connections between Burmese and Chinese Buddhists produced novel legal segregations of mixed communities. Further, this categorical splitting was generated along gendered lines, where judicial acceptance of men’s claims of Chinese separateness disenfranchised native, mixed, and migrant women who sought to foreground their connections to Burma.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2770-6869
2770-6877
DOI:10.1080/27706869.2023.2268377