Categorical confusions: gender and the colonial construction of the ‘Chinese Buddhist’ in Burma

British law in colonial Burma separated the legal personhood of imperial subjects by religious status. However, colonial law failed to clarify boundaries around religious categories. This lack of clarity was amplified when the court was forced to consider how to apply Buddhist law between different...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis Vol. 55; no. 3; pp. 430 - 452
Main Author: Venker, Matthew
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Abingdon Taylor & Francis Ltd 02.09.2023
Subjects:
ISSN:2770-6869, 2770-6877
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract British law in colonial Burma separated the legal personhood of imperial subjects by religious status. However, colonial law failed to clarify boundaries around religious categories. This lack of clarity was amplified when the court was forced to consider how to apply Buddhist law between different Buddhist communities, like the Chinese and Burmese. Owing to differences in how marriage, divorce, succession, and other rights are handled in Chinese- versus Burmese legal traditions, recognition as either Chinese or Burmese carried significant weight. Through a historical anthropology of Chinese-Burmese Buddhist family law in colonial Burma, this article argues that the British colonial judiciary’s failure to appreciate connections between Burmese and Chinese Buddhists produced novel legal segregations of mixed communities. Further, this categorical splitting was generated along gendered lines, where judicial acceptance of men’s claims of Chinese separateness disenfranchised native, mixed, and migrant women who sought to foreground their connections to Burma.
AbstractList British law in colonial Burma separated the legal personhood of imperial subjects by religious status. However, colonial law failed to clarify boundaries around religious categories. This lack of clarity was amplified when the court was forced to consider how to apply Buddhist law between different Buddhist communities, like the Chinese and Burmese. Owing to differences in how marriage, divorce, succession, and other rights are handled in Chinese- versus Burmese legal traditions, recognition as either Chinese or Burmese carried significant weight. Through a historical anthropology of Chinese-Burmese Buddhist family law in colonial Burma, this article argues that the British colonial judiciary’s failure to appreciate connections between Burmese and Chinese Buddhists produced novel legal segregations of mixed communities. Further, this categorical splitting was generated along gendered lines, where judicial acceptance of men’s claims of Chinese separateness disenfranchised native, mixed, and migrant women who sought to foreground their connections to Burma.
Author Venker, Matthew
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Matthew
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8974-9274
  surname: Venker
  fullname: Venker, Matthew
  organization: Visiting Fellow, Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
BookMark eNqFkM1OAyEUhYmpibX2EUwmcT0VmBkYdKUT_5ImbnRNKAMtZgoVmIU7H0Nfr08iY6sLN64ul3vOufAdg5F1VgFwiuAMwRqeY0ohqQmbYYiLGcakLig9AOPhPic1paPfM2FHYBqCWUCCcAVLQsZANiKqpfNGii6Tzuo-GGfDRbZUtlU-E7bN4kqlUees2WlC9L2MSZY5_T3cvn80K2NVUNl137YrE-L2_TMzNrV-LU7AoRZdUNN9nYDn25un5j6fP949NFfzXOIaxRwvkCpliSTEikBaalUwgiXVBKmWDe9VQuuqbCtYMVgvaMXST9pWlBoKxGQxAWe73I13r70Kkb-43tu0kmMGUyQsapxU1U4lvQvBK8033qyFf-MI8gEp_0HKB6R8jzT5Lv_4pIliwBC9MN0_7i-GZH9V
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_14672715_2025_2487704
crossref_primary_10_1080_13621025_2024_2425650
Cites_doi 10.1017/CBO9781139878418
10.21313/hawaii/9780824839376.001.0001
10.2307/jj.13316138
10.1163/179325406788639589
10.1177/0019464614550765
10.7591/cornell/9780801453311.001.0001
10.1017/S0021911809000709
10.1017/S0022463412000045
10.1080/17449359.2012.761491
10.1353/cch.2013.0014
10.1353/tcc.2022.0030
10.1017/CBO9781107256545
10.1080/13602008608715992
10.1017/S0022463400003295
10.1017/CBO9780511998416
10.1017/S0010417500001213
10.29085/9781783301577
10.1017/CBO9781139795364
10.1080/13504630.2018.1499223
10.1080/01419870.2015.1081963
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023 Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023 Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
8BJ
FQK
JBE
DOI 10.1080/27706869.2023.2268377
DatabaseName CrossRef
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
DatabaseTitleList International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anthropology
Law
EISSN 2770-6877
EndPage 452
ExternalDocumentID 10_1080_27706869_2023_2268377
GroupedDBID AAYXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
8BJ
FQK
JBE
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-2b1e4c41c02e6074fe3962c7f61ed95046eaff54d505908b759b06dda4f0a19c3
ISICitedReferencesCount 2
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001081636800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 2770-6869
IngestDate Sat Nov 08 02:33:43 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 03:55:22 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:50:59 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c281t-2b1e4c41c02e6074fe3962c7f61ed95046eaff54d505908b759b06dda4f0a19c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0000-0002-8974-9274
PQID 2906070382
PQPubID 2039130
PageCount 23
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_2906070382
crossref_primary_10_1080_27706869_2023_2268377
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_27706869_2023_2268377
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-09-02
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-09-02
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-09-02
  day: 02
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Abingdon
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Abingdon
PublicationTitle Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Taylor & Francis Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis Ltd
References e_1_3_4_4_1
e_1_3_4_3_1
e_1_3_4_2_1
e_1_3_4_9_1
e_1_3_4_8_1
e_1_3_4_7_1
e_1_3_4_6_1
e_1_3_4_5_1
e_1_3_3_17_1
e_1_3_3_19_1
e_1_3_3_14_1
e_1_3_3_16_1
Kolsky Elizabeth. (e_1_3_3_15_1) 2010
e_1_3_3_10_1
e_1_3_3_12_1
e_1_3_3_11_1
U Hla Aung. (e_1_3_3_27_1) 1958
Sharma Ruchika. (e_1_3_3_24_1) 2023
e_1_3_3_7_1
e_1_3_4_12_1
e_1_3_3_6_1
e_1_3_3_9_1
e_1_3_4_10_1
e_1_3_3_8_1
Roberts Jayde Lin. (e_1_3_3_22_1) 2016
e_1_3_4_11_1
Hussin Iza (e_1_3_3_13_1)
e_1_3_3_25_1
Li Yi. (e_1_3_3_18_1) 2017
e_1_3_3_26_1
Yahaya Nurfadzilah. (e_1_3_3_28_1)
e_1_3_3_3_1
e_1_3_3_21_1
e_1_3_3_2_1
e_1_3_3_20_1
e_1_3_3_5_1
e_1_3_3_23_1
e_1_3_3_4_1
References_xml – ident: e_1_3_4_2_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_10_1
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139878418
– ident: e_1_3_3_26_1
  doi: 10.21313/hawaii/9780824839376.001.0001
– ident: e_1_3_4_8_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_2_1
  doi: 10.2307/jj.13316138
– ident: e_1_3_3_3_1
  doi: 10.1163/179325406788639589
– ident: e_1_3_3_20_1
  doi: 10.1177/0019464614550765
– ident: e_1_3_4_10_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_5_1
  doi: 10.7591/cornell/9780801453311.001.0001
– ident: e_1_3_3_4_1
  doi: 10.1017/S0021911809000709
– ident: e_1_3_3_8_1
  doi: 10.1017/S0022463412000045
– volume-title: Colonial Justice in British India. Cambridge Studies in Indian History and Society 17. Cambridge ; New
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_3_3_15_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_6_1
  doi: 10.1080/17449359.2012.761491
– ident: e_1_3_3_14_1
  doi: 10.1353/cch.2013.0014
– ident: e_1_3_3_17_1
  doi: 10.1353/tcc.2022.0030
– volume-title: Concubinage, Race and Law in Early Colonial Bengal: Bequeathing Intimacy, Servicing the Empire
  year: 2023
  ident: e_1_3_3_24_1
– ident: e_1_3_4_5_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_23_1
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107256545
– ident: e_1_3_3_9_1
  doi: 10.1080/13602008608715992
– volume-title: Mapping Chinese Rangoon: Place and Nation among the Sino-Burmese
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_3_3_22_1
– ident: e_1_3_4_12_1
– ident: e_1_3_4_6_1
– ident: e_1_3_4_3_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_12_1
  doi: 10.1017/S0022463400003295
– ident: e_1_3_4_9_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_19_1
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511998416
– ident: e_1_3_3_7_1
  doi: 10.1017/S0010417500001213
– ident: e_1_3_4_7_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_25_1
  doi: 10.29085/9781783301577
– ident: e_1_3_3_21_1
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139795364
– ident: e_1_3_4_4_1
– ident: e_1_3_4_11_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_16_1
  doi: 10.1080/13504630.2018.1499223
– start-page: 25
  issue: 1
  year: 1958
  ident: e_1_3_3_27_1
  article-title: Sino-Burmese Marriages and Conflict of Laws
  publication-title: Burma Law Institute Journal
– volume-title: Fluid Jurisdictions: colonial Law and Arabs in Southeast Asia
  ident: e_1_3_3_28_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_11_1
  doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.1081963
– start-page: 155
  volume-title: The Making of Islamic Law: Local Elites and Colonial Authority in British Malaya
  ident: e_1_3_3_13_1
– volume-title: Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series
  year: 2017
  ident: e_1_3_3_18_1
SSID ssib061250466
ssib053393071
ssib047391089
Score 2.2446415
Snippet British law in colonial Burma separated the legal personhood of imperial subjects by religious status. However, colonial law failed to clarify boundaries...
SourceID proquest
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 430
SubjectTerms Anthropology
Asian cultural groups
Buddhists
Colonialism
Courts
Disenfranchisement
Divorce
Family law
Gender
Historical anthropology
Judiciary
Law
Marriage
Migrants
Personhood
Succession
Title Categorical confusions: gender and the colonial construction of the ‘Chinese Buddhist’ in Burma
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2906070382
Volume 55
WOSCitedRecordID wos001081636800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAWR
  databaseName: Taylor & Francis Criminology and Law Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2770-6877
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssib047391089
  issn: 2770-6869
  databaseCode: 1PW
  dateStart: 20220101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com
  providerName: Taylor & Francis
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NbtQwELaWwoELAgGiUJAP3Kosie2sbW60AnFA1R5K6S2K_9BKq7Riu1WPfQLO8Hp9EmZiO5sCAnrgEkVOMolmvthje-YbQl5Ko1vPZFt4x-pCeGsKw2te-FntVY0c5n39lKMP8uBAHR_r-WTyNefCnC9l16mLC336X00NbWBsTJ29gbkHodAA52B0OILZ4fhPht9H7oeB-aMLa1wP6wPfPvdl44aYSeSr7hbxroFGNscM5CAIhQW2_crv7q2dQ3LifEHjSsneOvfrOaXaw4izO18imUcuvzFUU0ipwJkHJdv6yHcptCMVHx-vRDDeh1qNFieZlDAVVbH0ytSP21KpltTjRmLehCw-6j5F2qOJI7GI3La_dPIxKhIl48um-ClT8CJhqi03o1reyf9psBtCEKvEjZrFNCimSWJukdtM1hpDBKv5p9w_CcnBudqw84OnrPnInUZnsYzb44MqctKYKl_99oOvu0PXvYHexTm8T-6luQl9EzH1gEx895DYEZ7oBk-vaUQTBQtTMBrNaKJjNNGT0F-8uvyWcEQzjq4uv9NFR3sEPSIf37093H9fpMochWWqOiuYqbyworIl8zNwQoPnesasDLPKO41K8G0ItXA15jYrA7oE9TjXilC2lbb8MdnqTjr_hFDHTCuVCS0SEzJttGg5kklbVgdnSr5NRFZQYxNtPVZPWTZ_tOA2mQ6PnUbelr89sJO136S_edVgLQQcExV7elN5z8jdzT-yQ7ZA8f45uWPPzxarLy96XP0AiRyR0A
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Categorical+confusions%3A+gender+and+the+colonial+construction+of+the+%E2%80%98Chinese+Buddhist%E2%80%99+in+Burma&rft.jtitle=Legal+Pluralism+and+Critical+Social+Analysis&rft.au=Venker%2C+Matthew&rft.date=2023-09-02&rft.issn=2770-6869&rft.eissn=2770-6877&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=430&rft.epage=452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F27706869.2023.2268377&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1080_27706869_2023_2268377
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2770-6869&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2770-6869&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2770-6869&client=summon