Constitutive Modeling of A286 Superalloy: Comparison of Improved Khan-Huang-Liang, Improved Johnson-Cook, and Genetic Algorithm-Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network Models

This study aims to develop high-precision constitutive models for A286 superalloy to accurately predict material flow stress and provide robust support for numerical simulations. Uniaxial quasi-static compression tests were performed to obtain the flow stress of A286 superalloy across strain rates f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of materials engineering and performance Vol. 34; no. 23; pp. 28170 - 28182
Main Authors: Tao, Liang, Feng, Zhiguo, Jiang, Yulian, Mo, Ningning, Lu, Rengang
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01.12.2025
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
ISSN:1059-9495, 1544-1024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aims to develop high-precision constitutive models for A286 superalloy to accurately predict material flow stress and provide robust support for numerical simulations. Uniaxial quasi-static compression tests were performed to obtain the flow stress of A286 superalloy across strain rates from 0.01 to 10 s −1 and temperatures from 25 to 600 °C. Based on the experimental data, three constitutive models were developed: an improved Khan-Huang-Liang (KHL) model, an improved Johnson-Cook (J-C) model, and a genetic algorithm-backpropagation artificial neural network (GA-BP ANN) model. The accuracy of the three models in predicting flow stress and their performance in numerical simulations were evaluated using the correlation coefficient ( R ), average absolute relative error ( AARE ), and relative error ( RE ). Results demonstrate that all three models effectively predict the material’s flow stress and are successfully applied in thin-walled tube simulations. Among them, the GA-BP ANN model achieves the highest accuracy in predicting flow stress ( R  = 0.999, AARE  = 1.6%) and simulation precision ( RE  = − 5.1%), followed by the improved J-C model ( R  = 0.979, AARE  = 1.7%, RE  = − 5.3%), and the improved KHL model with the lowest performance ( R  = 0.953, AARE  = 3.5%, RE  = − 6.2%).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1059-9495
1544-1024
DOI:10.1007/s11665-025-11425-w