A Preemptive Algorithm for Maximizing Disjoint Paths on Trees
We consider the on-line version of the maximum vertex disjoint path problem when the underlying network is a tree. In this problem, a sequence of requests arrives in an on-line fashion, where every request is a path in the tree. The on-line algorithm may accept a request only if it does not share a...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Algorithmica Vol. 57; no. 3; pp. 517 - 537 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York
Springer-Verlag
01.07.2010
Springer |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0178-4617, 1432-0541 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | We consider the on-line version of the maximum vertex disjoint path problem when the underlying network is a tree. In this problem, a sequence of requests arrives in an on-line fashion, where every request is a path in the tree. The on-line algorithm may accept a request only if it does not share a vertex with a previously accepted request. The goal is to maximize the number of accepted requests. It is known that no on-line algorithm can have a competitive ratio better than Ω(log
n
) for this problem, even if the algorithm is randomized and the tree is simply a line. Obviously, it is desirable to beat the logarithmic lower bound. Adler and Azar (Proc. of the 10th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithm, pp. 1–10,
1999
) showed that if preemption is allowed (namely, previously accepted requests may be discarded, but once a request is discarded it can no longer be accepted), then there is a randomized on-line algorithm that achieves constant competitive ratio on the line. In the current work we present a randomized on-line algorithm with preemption that has constant competitive ratio on any tree. Our results carry over to the related problem of maximizing the number of accepted paths subject to a capacity constraint on vertices (in the disjoint path problem this capacity is 1). Moreover, if the available capacity is at least 4, randomization is not needed and our on-line algorithm becomes deterministic. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0178-4617 1432-0541 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00453-009-9305-4 |