"It makes almost no difference which algorithm you use": on the modularity of predictive policing

Predictive policing is built on a simple assumption: crime exhibits predictable patterns, which means future crime risk can be forecast using historic crime data. While critics have raised concerns over the use of biased data in these systems, less is known about how software is actually used within...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Urban geography Ročník 43; číslo 9; s. 1437 - 1455
Hlavní autor: Lally, Nick
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Abingdon Routledge 21.10.2022
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Témata:
ISSN:0272-3638, 1938-2847
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Predictive policing is built on a simple assumption: crime exhibits predictable patterns, which means future crime risk can be forecast using historic crime data. While critics have raised concerns over the use of biased data in these systems, less is known about how software is actually used within infrastructures of governance. Drawing on interviews with software developers and an analysis of technical, promotional, and academic materials, I show how internal and external pressures separate predictive policing from the concrete practices it attempts to transform. I argue that predictive policing is a modular technology, plugged into the black box of policing. This modularity separates software developers from the practices they attempt to transform, while enabling them to deflect criticism away from the programs they build. Modularity also means that software can be reconfigured and connected to other systems, which threatens to undermine the set of best practices that guide its development.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0272-3638
1938-2847
DOI:10.1080/02723638.2021.1949142