Clarifying assumptions to enhance our understanding and assessment of clinical reasoning
Deciding on a diagnosis and treatment is essential to the practice of medicine. Developing competence in these clinical reasoning processes, commonly referred to as diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning, respectively, is required for physician success. Clinical reasoning has been a topic of research...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Academic medicine Ročník 88; číslo 4; s. 442 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
United States
01.04.2013
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1938-808X, 1938-808X |
| On-line přístup: | Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Deciding on a diagnosis and treatment is essential to the practice of medicine. Developing competence in these clinical reasoning processes, commonly referred to as diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning, respectively, is required for physician success. Clinical reasoning has been a topic of research for several decades, and much has been learned. However, there still exists no clear consensus regarding what clinical reasoning entails, let alone how it might best be taught, how it should be assessed, and the research and practice implications therein.In this article, the authors first discuss two contrasting epistemological views of clinical reasoning and related conceptual frameworks. They then outline four different theoretical frameworks held by medical educators that the authors believe guide educators' views on the topic, knowingly or not. Within each theoretical framework, the authors begin with a definition of clinical reasoning (from that viewpoint) and then discuss learning, assessment, and research implications. The authors believe these epistemologies and four theoretical frameworks also apply to other concepts (or "competencies") in medical education.The authors also maintain that clinical reasoning encompasses the mental processes and behaviors that are shared (or evolve) between the patient, physician, and the environment (i.e., practice setting). Clinical reasoning thus incorporates components of all three factors (patient, physician, environment). The authors conclude by outlining practical implications and potential future areas for research. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Deciding on a diagnosis and treatment is essential to the practice of medicine. Developing competence in these clinical reasoning processes, commonly referred to as diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning, respectively, is required for physician success. Clinical reasoning has been a topic of research for several decades, and much has been learned. However, there still exists no clear consensus regarding what clinical reasoning entails, let alone how it might best be taught, how it should be assessed, and the research and practice implications therein.In this article, the authors first discuss two contrasting epistemological views of clinical reasoning and related conceptual frameworks. They then outline four different theoretical frameworks held by medical educators that the authors believe guide educators' views on the topic, knowingly or not. Within each theoretical framework, the authors begin with a definition of clinical reasoning (from that viewpoint) and then discuss learning, assessment, and research implications. The authors believe these epistemologies and four theoretical frameworks also apply to other concepts (or "competencies") in medical education.The authors also maintain that clinical reasoning encompasses the mental processes and behaviors that are shared (or evolve) between the patient, physician, and the environment (i.e., practice setting). Clinical reasoning thus incorporates components of all three factors (patient, physician, environment). The authors conclude by outlining practical implications and potential future areas for research. Deciding on a diagnosis and treatment is essential to the practice of medicine. Developing competence in these clinical reasoning processes, commonly referred to as diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning, respectively, is required for physician success. Clinical reasoning has been a topic of research for several decades, and much has been learned. However, there still exists no clear consensus regarding what clinical reasoning entails, let alone how it might best be taught, how it should be assessed, and the research and practice implications therein.In this article, the authors first discuss two contrasting epistemological views of clinical reasoning and related conceptual frameworks. They then outline four different theoretical frameworks held by medical educators that the authors believe guide educators' views on the topic, knowingly or not. Within each theoretical framework, the authors begin with a definition of clinical reasoning (from that viewpoint) and then discuss learning, assessment, and research implications. The authors believe these epistemologies and four theoretical frameworks also apply to other concepts (or "competencies") in medical education.The authors also maintain that clinical reasoning encompasses the mental processes and behaviors that are shared (or evolve) between the patient, physician, and the environment (i.e., practice setting). Clinical reasoning thus incorporates components of all three factors (patient, physician, environment). The authors conclude by outlining practical implications and potential future areas for research.Deciding on a diagnosis and treatment is essential to the practice of medicine. Developing competence in these clinical reasoning processes, commonly referred to as diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning, respectively, is required for physician success. Clinical reasoning has been a topic of research for several decades, and much has been learned. However, there still exists no clear consensus regarding what clinical reasoning entails, let alone how it might best be taught, how it should be assessed, and the research and practice implications therein.In this article, the authors first discuss two contrasting epistemological views of clinical reasoning and related conceptual frameworks. They then outline four different theoretical frameworks held by medical educators that the authors believe guide educators' views on the topic, knowingly or not. Within each theoretical framework, the authors begin with a definition of clinical reasoning (from that viewpoint) and then discuss learning, assessment, and research implications. The authors believe these epistemologies and four theoretical frameworks also apply to other concepts (or "competencies") in medical education.The authors also maintain that clinical reasoning encompasses the mental processes and behaviors that are shared (or evolve) between the patient, physician, and the environment (i.e., practice setting). Clinical reasoning thus incorporates components of all three factors (patient, physician, environment). The authors conclude by outlining practical implications and potential future areas for research. |
| Author | Schuwirth, Lambert van der Vleuten, Cees Durning, Steven J Artino, Jr, Anthony R |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Steven J surname: Durning fullname: Durning, Steven J email: steven.durning@usuhs.edu organization: Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA. steven.durning@usuhs.edu – sequence: 2 givenname: Anthony R surname: Artino, Jr fullname: Artino, Jr, Anthony R – sequence: 3 givenname: Lambert surname: Schuwirth fullname: Schuwirth, Lambert – sequence: 4 givenname: Cees surname: van der Vleuten fullname: van der Vleuten, Cees |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23425980$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpN0MlKBDEQBuAgI86ibyCSo5ces_SSHIfGDUa8KMytyVLRSHcydroP8_a2OoKnKn4-Cv5aolmIARC6pGRNiaxuNvXTmmhCOXAqmCioLvQJWlDJRSaI2M3-7XO0TOmDEFJWBT9Dc8ZzVkhBFmhXt6r37uDDG1Ypjd1-8DEkPEQM4V0FAziOPR6DhT4NKtgfGOw3hpQ6CAOODpvWB29Ui3tQKYYJnaNTp9oEF8e5Qq93ty_1Q7Z9vn-sN9vMsFLoTFvhSmcpSGmkdVozpiuhtZQWhFK80oppCYaycooqYXLqSFVa53JeUQtsha5_7-77-DlCGprOJwNtqwLEMTWUM8q5nOpO9OpIR92Bbfa971R_aP6-wb4A-Dtnuw |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sapharm_2020_04_005 crossref_primary_10_3138_jvme_2022_0018 crossref_primary_10_2522_ptj_20150320 crossref_primary_10_1111_tct_13436 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2025_2514119 crossref_primary_10_3390_admsci10040094 crossref_primary_10_1007_S40037_022_00701_3 crossref_primary_10_1097_JPA_0000000000000367 crossref_primary_10_1179_2042618613Y_0000000051 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40596_024_02111_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_023_08549_x crossref_primary_10_1515_dx_2024_0184 crossref_primary_10_7205_MILMED_D_14_00572 crossref_primary_10_1097_PEP_0000000000000667 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_023_08359_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcp_14187 crossref_primary_10_1002_chp_21215 crossref_primary_10_1080_10401334_2013_842907 crossref_primary_10_1515_dx_2019_0051 crossref_primary_10_1111_medu_12823 crossref_primary_10_1093_ptj_pzy148 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_015_3534_9 crossref_primary_10_1177_23821205231209093 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_017_1004_2 crossref_primary_10_5688_ajpe8697 crossref_primary_10_1080_10401334_2020_1749635 crossref_primary_10_4103_jehp_jehp_1016_23 crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000009544 crossref_primary_10_1111_jep_12852 crossref_primary_10_3390_electronics10172075 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19020936 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2017_1419521 crossref_primary_10_1111_medu_13000 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2023_1017783 crossref_primary_10_1080_0142159X_2019_1626977 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aprim_2015_02_008 crossref_primary_10_12968_hmed_2020_0227 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2016_09_053 crossref_primary_10_2522_ptj_20150473 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_015_0136_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_016_0709_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jth_2017_09_003 crossref_primary_10_1111_medu_12570 crossref_primary_10_1001_jama_2018_4385 crossref_primary_10_1080_17483107_2019_1647568 crossref_primary_10_1097_PEP_0000000000000185 crossref_primary_10_1093_ptj_pzz044 crossref_primary_10_1080_08039488_2019_1709892 crossref_primary_10_1097_ACM_0000000000004810 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_060101 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12186_017_9183_x crossref_primary_10_1177_0309364619852455 crossref_primary_10_1080_10833196_2017_1289647 crossref_primary_10_1097_JTE_0000000000000110 crossref_primary_10_1080_0142159X_2022_2031943 crossref_primary_10_1111_jep_12641 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijcrp_2025_200480 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_017_0983_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_14739879_2021_1961611 crossref_primary_10_1097_00001416_201529030_00006 crossref_primary_10_1111_medu_12509 crossref_primary_10_1515_dx_2018_0004 crossref_primary_10_1111_jan_12475 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_024_09058_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_0142159X_2021_2020230 crossref_primary_10_1080_0142159X_2022_2105200 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_020_02012_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_medu_15461 crossref_primary_10_3109_0142159X_2015_1047755 crossref_primary_10_1002_ca_24256 crossref_primary_10_1080_0142159X_2018_1481281 crossref_primary_10_1515_dx_2019_0100 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40841_021_00234_z crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_020_1990_3 crossref_primary_10_3934_publichealth_2018_3_235 crossref_primary_10_1515_dx_2017_0044 crossref_primary_10_1111_jep_12905 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_9727 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2023_107718 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2024_2320263 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_016_0714_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_S40037_015_0196_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cptl_2022_09_011 crossref_primary_10_1097_JXX_0000000000000902 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_020_02185_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsps_2021_10_003 crossref_primary_10_1515_dx_2019_0073 crossref_primary_10_2196_14428 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare2030253 crossref_primary_10_1097_JTE_0000000000000221 crossref_primary_10_1111_medu_14545 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_math_2014_10_001 crossref_primary_10_1097_JTE_0000000000000062 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0204900 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijosm_2018_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_024_05624_7 crossref_primary_10_1080_0142159X_2024_2337251 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182851b5b |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Education |
| EISSN | 1938-808X |
| ExternalDocumentID | 23425980 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .-D .3C .55 .GJ .Z2 01R 07C 0R~ 1CY 1J1 23M 2FS 3O- 40H 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 77Y 7O~ AAAAV AAAXR AAFWJ AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAMOA AAMTA AAQKA AARTV AASCR AASOK AAWTL AAXQO ABASU ABBUW ABDIG ABIVO ABJNI ABPXF ABVCZ ABXVJ ABZAD ABZZY ACCJW ACDDN ACEWG ACGFO ACGFS ACILI ACLDA ACNCT ACNWC ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ACZKN ADFPA ADGGA ADHPY ADNKB AE3 AEETU AENEX AETEA AFBFQ AFDTB AFFNX AFUWQ AGINI AHJKT AHOMT AHQNM AHRYX AHVBC AI. AIJEX AINUH AJCLO AJIOK AJNWD AJNYG AJZMW AKCTQ AKULP ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AOQMC BOYCO BQLVK BS7 BYPQX C1A C45 CGR CS3 CUY CVF DIWNM DUNZO E.X EBS ECM EEVPB EIF EJD ERAAH EX3 F2K F2L F2M F2N F5P FCALG FL- FW0 GNXGY GQDEL H0~ HLJTE HZ~ H~9 IKREB IKYAY IN~ IPNFZ J5H JF9 JG8 JK3 JK8 K8S KD2 KMI L-C L7B MVM MZP N4W N9A NEJ NPM N~7 N~B N~M O9- OAG OAH OCUKA ODA OHT OLG OLH OLU OLV OLY OLZ OPUJH ORVUJ OUVQU OVD OVDNE OVIDH OVLEI OWU OWV OWW OWX OWY OWZ OXXIT P-K P2P P6G R58 RIG RLZ S4R S4S SJN T8P TEORI TR2 TSPGW TWZ V2I VH1 VVN W3M WF8 WF9 WH7 WOQ WOW X3V X3W X7M XJT XYM YHG YR5 ZCG ZFV ZGI ZXP ZY1 ZZMQN 7X8 ACBKD |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c268b-bd8f6fd1e99c9dfbb22b78bb99de8aa37ba2b9ec12699d78c41f076dff4371de2 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISSN | 1938-808X |
| IngestDate | Sun Nov 09 13:32:27 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:54:12 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c268b-bd8f6fd1e99c9dfbb22b78bb99de8aa37ba2b9ec12699d78c41f076dff4371de2 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/a4dcc673-e181-40e3-a6bb-e4968feef18d |
| PMID | 23425980 |
| PQID | 1321339259 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1321339259 pubmed_primary_23425980 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2013-Apr |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2013 text: 2013-Apr |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Academic medicine |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Acad Med |
| PublicationYear | 2013 |
| SSID | ssj0006753 |
| Score | 2.43602 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Deciding on a diagnosis and treatment is essential to the practice of medicine. Developing competence in these clinical reasoning processes, commonly referred... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 442 |
| SubjectTerms | Clinical Competence Concept Formation Decision Making Education, Medical - organization & administration Humans Models, Educational |
| Title | Clarifying assumptions to enhance our understanding and assessment of clinical reasoning |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23425980 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1321339259 |
| Volume | 88 |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3JTsMwELWAIsSFpWxlk5G4Wm2cxfYJVRUVB1r1ACi3yOPYopek0JbvZ5xF5YKExCWRIieK7JfJm_GbGULujTFoG61mYSQ4iyDmTA9yYGGIfphFTCWVqvLtWUynMk3VrAm4LRtZZWsTK0Odl8bHyPvoNaE7pZCtPyw-mO8a5XdXmxYa26QTIpXxqBbpplp4UlehRI4i0RLLtE2dU6I_HE02MUCOtANi-J1kVj-b8eF_X_OIHDQ0kw5rXByTLVt0fYfmRs3RJXuTZlP9hKReozOv8p0oUmlc3wqLdFVSW7x7VFB8HF3_TIOhePKDm6qetHS0zbGkXuZeBXlPyev48WX0xJqGC8zwRAKDXLrE5YFVyqjcAXAOQgIolVupdShAc1DWBDzBS0KaKHADkeTORaEIcsvPyE5RFvaCUBeja63iKAFhIx2BlEEUWx2rQCoDoe2Ru3b-MgS036XQhS3Xy2wzgz1yXi9Ctqgrb2Q8RBOj5ODyD3dfkX1eta7wKptr0nH4Odsbsmu-VvPl522FFDxOZ5NvAVDJog |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clarifying+assumptions+to+enhance+our+understanding+and+assessment+of+clinical+reasoning&rft.jtitle=Academic+medicine&rft.au=Durning%2C+Steven+J&rft.au=Artino%2C+Jr%2C+Anthony+R&rft.au=Schuwirth%2C+Lambert&rft.au=van+der+Vleuten%2C+Cees&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.eissn=1938-808X&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FACM.0b013e3182851b5b&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23425980&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23425980&rft.externalDocID=23425980 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1938-808X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1938-808X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1938-808X&client=summon |