Algorithmic State Machine Design and Automatic Theorem Proving: Two Dual Approaches to the Same Activity
This paper shows that synthesizing binary decision programs (formed by means of decision instructions of the type if then else and of execution instructions of the type do) and proving theorems can be carried out by using the same approach. It is proved that the same transformations acting on P-func...
Saved in:
| Published in: | IEEE transactions on computers Vol. C-35; no. 10; pp. 853 - 861 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York, NY
IEEE
01.10.1986
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0018-9340, 1557-9956 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This paper shows that synthesizing binary decision programs (formed by means of decision instructions of the type if then else and of execution instructions of the type do) and proving theorems can be carried out by using the same approach. It is proved that the same transformations acting on P-functions can be interpreted in terms of binary program synthesis and of theorem proving. Since binary program leads to algorithmic state machine design while theorem proving leads to declarative programming, this allows us to lay a bridge between logic design and declarative languages such as Prolog. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0018-9340 1557-9956 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/TC.1986.1676676 |