Allowance or service: Public attitudes toward childcare‐related family policies in China

Childcare has been considered a ‘new’ social risk and various childcare regimes have been developed worldwide to tackle this social problem. While welfare attitude studies have paid attention to public attitudes toward childcare services, little is known about public attitudes toward other childcare...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social policy & administration Vol. 59; no. 3; pp. 529 - 547
Main Authors: Fan, Xin, Ngok, Kinglun
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.05.2025
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Age effects
Ambiguity
Attitudes
Child care
childcare regimes
childcare‐related family policies
Family policy
Fertility
general support
Latent class analysis
Polls & surveys
prioritised support
public attitudes
Public opinion
Social factors
Socioeconomic factors
Welfare
China
ISSN:0144-5596, 1467-9515
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Childcare has been considered a ‘new’ social risk and various childcare regimes have been developed worldwide to tackle this social problem. While welfare attitude studies have paid attention to public attitudes toward childcare services, little is known about public attitudes toward other childcare‐related family policies (i.e., leave and allowance). Using novel and unique survey data on welfare attitudes from China, this article investigates how socioeconomic factors matter to general as well as prioritised support for three types of childcare‐related family policies and to policy regimes in China where low fertility crisis is emerging. The survey data suggests the biggest gap between general and prioritised support is found in allowance policy and the smallest in service policy. Regression models suggest that the biggest gap between general and prioritised support for allowance policy can be explained by the reversed and negative effects of education and gender. We further develop a typology of public support for childcare regimes using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) and find four types: implicit and explicit familialism, de‐familialism, and ambiguous familialism. The results of multinomial logistic regression on public support for childcare regimes confirm the findings on prioritised support for different policies and suggest a bifurcation effect of age on regime preferences. We discuss the implications of the findings in the conclusion.
Bibliography:Correction added on 8 August 2024, after first online publication: Affiliations 2 and 3 has been interchanged in this version.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0144-5596
1467-9515
DOI:10.1111/spol.13076