Intelligent performance enhancement of flue gas waste heat recovery in combined low-temperature economizer – Air heater systems
To enhance flue gas waste heat recovery (FGWHR) and address the significant time delay in traditional Proportional-Integral-Derivative control of the low-temperature economizer (LLTE) and air heater (AR) system, a capacity expansion retrofit integrating an air heater (AR) with the LLTE in a 1000 MW...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Process safety and environmental protection Jg. 202; S. 107812 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Elsevier Ltd
01.10.2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0957-5820 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | To enhance flue gas waste heat recovery (FGWHR) and address the significant time delay in traditional Proportional-Integral-Derivative control of the low-temperature economizer (LLTE) and air heater (AR) system, a capacity expansion retrofit integrating an air heater (AR) with the LLTE in a 1000 MW coal-fired unit was investigated. The retrofit’s effects on key performance indicators, such as thermal efficiency, power generation, and coal consumption, were evaluated. The predictive performances of Backpropagation, Long Short-Term Memory, Temporal Convolutional Network–Transformer, and Least Squares Support Vector Machine models (LSSVM) for flue gas parameters were compared, with the Constrained Particle Optimization (CPO)- LSSVM model achieving the highest accuracy and generalization. By utilizing the predicted flue gas parameters, real-time optimization was carried out through CPO-HYSYS. The thermal efficiency and environmental benefits were both enhanced. It is demonstrated that intelligent algorithms for real-time flue gas prediction and optimization provide an effective solution to overcome lag in FGWHR systems.
[Display omitted]
•Practical application of LLTE combined AR on 1000 MW unit is tested.•Compared BP, LSTM, TCN-Transformer, and LSSVM prediction performance for flue gas.•Real-time optimization analysis conducted using CPO- HYSYS.•RMSE for flue gas temperature and flow rate prediction are 0.129 and 15.67.•Coal consumption decreased by 0.26 g/kWh, flue gas WHR increased by 2.51 MW. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0957-5820 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.psep.2025.107812 |