Computer‐mediated feedback for L2 learners: Challenges versus affordances
This paper reviews the theoretical and pedagogical affordances and challenges highlighted in studies on correcting second language (L2) learners' errors via computer‐mediated feedback (CMF) in blended and distance learning. The study aimed at understanding and conveying the reported challenges...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Journal of computer assisted learning Ročník 37; číslo 1; s. 24 - 38 |
|---|---|
| Hlavný autor: | |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.02.2021
Wiley Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 0266-4909, 1365-2729 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Shrnutí: | This paper reviews the theoretical and pedagogical affordances and challenges highlighted in studies on correcting second language (L2) learners' errors via computer‐mediated feedback (CMF) in blended and distance learning. The study aimed at understanding and conveying the reported challenges and affordances of CMF to inform the computer‐assisted language learning practitioners. To this end, 97 peer‐reviewed articles published from 2012 to 2020 that discussed CMF with respect to receptive and productive language skills were systematically reviewed. The collected data were tabularized in terms of receptive and productive skills. To visualize the results, the obtained data were arranged in four hierarchical database formats with respect to four language skills. The implications of the study are twofold. Pedagogically, teachers are informed useful affordances that can be used to give feedback during teaching. Theoretically, researchers are informed about challenges that require further investigation.
Lay Description
What is already known about this topic
The efficacy of providing via computer‐assisted tools and affordances
What this paper adds
Presenting a hierarchy of affordances that can be utilized by L2 teachers for giving computer‐mediated feedback
Informing the CALL practitioners about the challenges that reportedly require further analysis to expand the research in the field
Implications for practice and/or policy
The main theoretical implication is the need to consider individual learner differences before using any feedback type to correct errors plus several other implications that are discussed in the article.
The main pedagogical implication of the study is the need to contextualize the reported affordances for computer‐mediated feedback based on the nonlinearity and dynamicity of the individual learner differences |
|---|---|
| Bibliografia: | Peer Review The peer review history for this article is available at . https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/jcal.12481 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0266-4909 1365-2729 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jcal.12481 |